For me it's Big Sur;Modern enough for the software to work goodHas more software than linuxCan be installed on ancient mac from 2013-15Has universal time machine backup so can be restored on any new mac from 2013-20Has bootcamp for windows 10God, linux sucks
Im on Sequoia and it looks the same, not sure if same can be said about Tahoma
>>107820019>Big saar
>>107820019OP YOU ARE VAARY BIG HANDSOME SAAAAR!
>>107820058>YOU ARE VAARY BIG HANDSOMEI know :^)software installed and configured to workbackup done still more software than linux after 10 years btw.
>>107820163you are trying too hard my young friend
>>107820019Why is people shitting on Mac too, only the design team got invaded by Indians, but the backend should still be filled with competent people right? It's not Windows
>>107820432because they are linux fags coping other company can make functional OS with tons of software while linux has like few of these that are working good at all
Should I update to Tahoe 26.2 or wait till .3? Sequoia is completely fine right now for me, I'm just curious.
>>107820035yeah, samesticking with sequoia for quite a bitdefinitely skipping tahoe all-together, maybe even next release alsoretard responsible for liquid ass design left apple, so maybe in 2027 they'll make somewhat normal OS again
>>107820432I used a mac for a month recently and was actually quite disappointed. I heard mac had good user experience and attention to detail but that's not reality. It's still better than any Linux but doesn't hold a candle to Windows when it was still good.
>>107822328tahoe 16.2 is already fine.>>107822346you can turn off Liquid Glass lol?>>107822765Delulu windows was always trash.
>>107820019Yeah I wish I could rollback my m1, I undestand oldfag mac crying about OSX or whatever.This fucking sucks balls.The screenshot tool fucking lags.
Big Saar is when they made the GUI look like an iphone, Catalina actually looks pretty good even if it doesn't quite have the sovl of aqua