IPS or OLED?
>>107821187Once you go OLED it's hard to go back. Avoid.
>>107821213>>107821187I don't want burn in
I love that the OLED image protection methods are all literally artificially dimming and fucking up the picture equally so you don't notice that zones that have already gone bad that much
>>107821187I can hardly tell a different in terms of how much I care.
>>107821225>>I have over 3000 hours on my C4 now and still no burn-in in tests.>you sweet summer child. still no burn in on pic related used exclusively as a computer monitorpic related
>>107821267Turn them off.
>>107821283>"Device Name"Text cutoff.Fucking disgusting.
>>107821293Most people don't though and then wonder why their display is fucked after a few months
E ink
>>107821283LED uses the same technology as CRT, retardwhich means: burn in
>>107821283>Same pic again>Doesn't disprove task at burn in>Doesn't disprove any burn in>Trust me broCome back with the solid color full panel test, LGook.
>>107821343It does not use the same technology, even if the results are similar.CRTs have a phosphor layer that can get literally burnt over time, causing image retention even when off.OLED image retention is caused by the organic compounds in each subpixel degrading over time to not be able to emit as much light. Which is why it's more visible when only certain colors are supposed to be emitted.
>>107821187My desktop monitor is IPS, my phone, laptop and TV are OLED.I've had the laptop for over 2 years now and I use it for work and after work so 8+ hours a day of mostly static content, so far there has been no burn in or degradation. No degradation on my phone or TV either, but those don't have as much screen on time. As far as I'm concerned OLED is already good enough for almost every use case.I'll switch my desktop monitor to OLED when DELL or another decent manufacturer releases an OLED monitor with an integrated Thunderbolt dock and KVM switch.The U2724DE I'm using is simply way too convenient and works perfectly for my use case.
>>107821373Burn-in and image retention aren't the same thing. Even LCDs can have image retention.
>>107821283>>107821391>As far as I'm concerned OLED is already good enough for almost every use case.Same.
>>107821187They are both absolutely cute kitties. I love them
>>107821526They'll poo on your corpse after having lived with you their whole life
>>107821187ips, office internetoled, moviescrt, games
>>107821187I got a ProArt IPS and a $700 OLED, I'd still say go for IPS if it's ProArt quality.Ghosting/artifacting on blacks is still a thing somehow, and if you get VRR you will see flicker so you gonna have to disable it.
>>107821539I'll make a pair of slippers out of them after having lived with them their whole lives. Your point?
>>107821640Dogs are better
>>107821688Depends on the breed, I suppose. The ones that look like curly rugs could probably be made into some decent slippers.
>>107821539>>107821688Both will eat you if you die and they get hungry.
Can anybody explain why OLED monitors have burnin issues yet I've never seen of my OLED phones, even very old ones, exhibit such behavior?
>>107822217Your phone screen is not on 8+ hours unless you're mentally insane, and you can probably see a bit of a burn in if your phone is older when you blast full brightness on.Also OLED monitors don't really have a burn in issue unless you leave your PC on for a week with taskbar shown on max brightness.
>>107822217>Can anybody explain why OLED monitors have burnin issuesThey don't anymoreit's just a meme repeated over and over again by mentally ill millennials and tech illiterate zoomersAll types of monitors, even IPS/LCD/LED are subject to burn in, if anything I've witnessed more of it on those kind of displays than modern & high end OLED on iPhones and SmartTVs
>>107821187Don't care to upgrade now but if my current setup dies I'll probably get on the oled bandwagon. I'm a bit concerned that streaming artifacts become more noticeable on oleds but we'll see I guess.
>>107821187OLED for phones and TVs, IPS for monitors.
IPS
>>107822276>They don't anymoreThis is a false statement, literally, they do, always will.They just don't burn in AS EASY anymore, but they still do, maybe you're the zoomer here, if you can't read facts go ask your little chat bot 6 7 no cap on g.
>>107821225>>107821187OLED has some issues, but like anon said, it's hard to go back. Every other panel looks like shit after trying OLED.
>>107822217My old SII got burn-in within weeks. Granted, that was in 2012.>>107822255My Xiaomi from 2022 has zero burn-in. Used it as my main phone for almost 4 years. OLED has come a long way. >>107822276They do but it's far better then it use to be. >>107822314This.
>>107821187IPS cat looks more cute tho.
>>107821623>I got a ProArt IPS and a $700 OLED, I'd still say go for IPS if it's ProArt quality.BruhI got a ProArt and it's a piece of shit, probably the worst backlight bleed I've ever seen, worse ghosting than some 60Hz screens I've had despite being 75Hz, plus it has these vertical lines whenever I use any kind of blue light filter. It's probably more to do with it being bottom of the barrel 1920x1200 panel, but just don't say shit like "ProArt quality" like it's a universal seal of quality, because it fucking ain't.
Would pet both.
>>107821187whichever is cheaper, because im running a bluelight filter literally 100% of the time i am using my computer and colors don't fucking matter
Would fuck both.
>>107821187I miss my iMac 27 5k monitor .. I am not a fucking monitor nerd so I have no fucking clue what technology it uses, but I am tired of shit monitors now that I'm on Linux.. what type of monitor will give me the resolution, brightness and overall perfection of an apple made monitor?
>>107822311>This is a false statement, literally, they do, always will.Yes physically it will and so will your oldtroon IPS/LED/LCD displays >They just don't burn in AS EASY anymoreYes because they are more efficient and have built in protections. an average non-oled is more likely to have burn in than the average oled.>maybe you're the zoomer hereAre you low IQ or just a poor mentally ill millennial?If you've experienced both technologies through the years in all sorts of devices you wouldn't disagree
>>107821244does it really last for 5 years? that's more than I thought it would
>>107821623>>107822353You need a really high-end IPS with A-TW polarizer and you'll still have some bleed. >>107821623>Ghosting/artifacting on blacks is still a thing somehowOLED doesn't have that. No idea what your issue is. >and if you get VRR you will see flicker so you gonna have to disable it.Depends on the monitor, not a OLED issue. There's IPS that have horrible VRR flicker and OLEDs that have basically none and in very specific scenarios.
>>107822399>Yes physically it will and so will your oldtroon IPS/LED/LCD displays>Yes because they are more efficient and have built in protections. an average non-oled is more likely to have burn in than the average oled.No idea if you're actually misinformed or just shitposting. OLED burn-in isn't as big of an issue as it used to be but it's much easier to burn-in an OLED than an IPS or VA.
IPS Black
>>107822255Looking back, I don't think it's the screen time but rather the fact that I used them phones with a very low brightness setting. Being an incel hermit I don't have much light coming in at all, and that makes anything look bright enough.
>>107821225Just get a miniled. It's almost as good as an oled, and no risk of burn in.
>>107822386why not use your apple monitor
>>107821623>>107822353ProArt isn't a indicator of quality. You can get cheap gaming monitor tier ProArts. If you want a good IPS get something like Eizo ColorEdge CG279X.
>>107822464its fine for tvs in the living roomwith how cheap oleds are for monitors its kinda pointless. you can just buy a new monitor after a few years oled pixel response times make for better gaming toomaybe if they really push for cheap rgb+ miniled monitors fast they might gain marketshare, if not its not a big deal
>>107822255>Also OLED monitors don't really have a burn in issue unless you leave your PC on for a week with taskbar shown on max brightness.You'd neve want to use an OLED with 100% emitter brightness anyways for desktop use.
>>107822475I don't think it makes sense to buy technology that has a high risk of shitting itself at any moment.
>>107822464Basically what >>107822475 said.MiniLED is only useful at bigger sizes. >>107822488Any tech can shit itself at any moment, OLEDs burn-in gradually though if you mean the burn-in part.
>>107822464MiniLED monitors are all fucking awful.>>107822488You're fucking retarded. OLED burn-in is an extremely gradual process. LED monitors (Mini or otherwise) are more likely to shit themself at any given moment, as Rtings' durability test has made clear.https://www.rtings.com/tv/tests/longevity-burn-in-test-updates-and-results
>>107822446>but it's much easier to burn-in an OLED than an IPS or VA.How? The ceiling of quality and price for OLED products is pretty high while IPS mostly relegated to budget and ewaste products that are meant to be replaced in less than half a decade
>>107822507We're talking about burn-in. Price, quality, the endurance of other parts of the hardware is irrelevant. >How?Just how OLEDs work, all LEDs loose brightness over time when in use.
>>107822469>Eizo ColorEdge CG279X.According to the specs it has a 1300:1 static contrast ratio and up to 350cd/m2 brightness i.e. someone played around with the exposure to make it look like it has good blacks.My IPS monitor is supposed to have a 2000:1 static contrast, but at the brightness I use it at I measured it at 1600:1, maybe it will reach 2000:1 at lower brightness but you can't make me use 120cd/m2, it's way too dim unless in a dark room.
>>107822535>We're talking about burn-in. Price, quality, the endurance of other parts of the hardware is irrelevant.In that case your average OLED is as likely to burn in as your best LCD/IPS
>>107822541>My IPS monitorModel?
Alright you nerds, so what are my options if I want:>zero flicker, even at low brightness>minimal ghosting, even at low brightness>no TN style colour shifting>no IPS style backlight bleedingI don't give a fuck about burn-in, mostly because I stick to low brightness, so I'm happy to pay that price provided I get the rest
>>107822386It's nothing special LG sold the same panel in their monitors, maybe the problem is MacOS handles font rendering differently and arguably better than Windows and Linux.
>>107822600Well OLED, but it does have slightly flicker at any brightness.This is thetically of course, you won't notice it. Otherwise to get no ghosting, bleed or color shift, OLED.
>>107822598DELL U2724DE they call the panel IPS Black in the marketing for it. When I got it there simply wasn't another display that did everything in one 120Hz, KVM+Thunderbolt dock, 2.5Gb NIC etc. even my TV is daisy chained from the monitor.
>>107822501You sound like a retard cultist. Enjoy your shit monitor that can destroy itself any second, moronic faggot. I'll enjoy my miniled that's no different from it for the next decade.
>>107822620On all OLED phone screens I've had so far, when I turned the brighness all the way down I had both flicker (which I seem to be autistically sensitive to) and ridiculous ghosting (colours adapting extra slowly when scrolling). You're telling me OLED PC monitors just don't have these issues at zero brightness?
Im just gonna get one of those G-Sync pulsar displays when the price of them goes down.
>>107822646Only shit OLED phones have those issues.
Sony Crystal LED mogs every other flatpanel tech, except it's probably too costly for the average neet.
>>107822541>>107822627No A-TW polarizer, that's probably where the difference comes in.
>>107822646Sounds like the phones weren't very good desu. But yes, OLEDs on phones are different as they have to address different requirements, they get way dimmer at low brightness and way brighter at peak brightness than an OLED monitor.
>>107822686The polarizer solves off-axis glow, it doesn't really fix the poor static contrast of IPS monitors.
>>107821302It's probably scrollable and he reached the bottom
>>107821187I like oled for tv, still use ips for monitor.
>>107821187oled nyan much cuter
I got an OLED laptop (ThinkPad X9 15) and the calibrated Samsung panel it came with is a piece of shit.Awful green tint, worse color accuracy than the AUO IPS panel (B140QAN03.H) in my other laptop. Mura effect makes everything grey/dark look grainy as fuck.Ghosting on black.VRR is a piece of shit.PWM is 1,200Hz so not bad but still slight eye strain.Also huge fucking battery drain.X9 15 would have been better with a high refresh IPS.
>>107821283Yes just buy the TV that screenshots everything and sends it to LG
>>107822370why though?
>>107822217You're either blind or you were in diapers in 2016The Galaxy S7 got burn in easy
>>107821213Agreed but I will say a monitor with ~100% sRGB and or BT.2020 like Thinkpad T24-40i is a big improvement over yesterday’s IPS monitors.
>>107821401Thank you for agreeing with me
Am I really gonna spend more than 1000 euros for an OLED monitor ffs
>>107821283>Less than 3 years of use.Lol
>>107821213it is actually quite easy after you get burn in on your first paneli went back to IPs. i dont have time to deal with RMAing luxury panels after only 8 months of use. its indian tech>>107821225indian LG shills are going to tell you its solved, it isntif you touch the brightness level it will burn in under a year easy. they come real dim by default. its such a stupid ass techthe daily oled threads on here and /g/ are 100% inorganic and half the posts are going to be by 1 guy
Just get a good VA monitor. I got a 2020 27" Odyssey G7 and it's been bretty gud. Way better contrast than my old IPS monitor and no visible smearing to speak of
>>107824708because blue light is uncomfortable when you stare at screens for 18+ hours a day
>>107824531all tvs do that. because i am not a braindead moron i never connected mine to a network. i use my ps5 for the "smart" tv apps.>>107821283me too anon. i have this same tv. i left it on gta vice city map for 2 days (still image) and constantly leave it on paused yt videos. 0 burn in
I use my computer 10+ hours every fucking day and there's a taskbar at the bottom almost all the time and no I'm not changing my habits. Is OLED viable or is my taskbar going to just burn in in like a year or two?
>>107826940There are videos out there of people burning in oleds 24/7 at full brightness and it takes like 6 months or something for some slight degradation to appear. If you use it normally alongside the oled care features then a brand new oled should last you 5 years easily.
OLED is consumer trash, it's the equivalent of bass-boosted speakers to impress normies with the contrast.Ask yourself: why doesn't EIZO that makes professional color-accurate displays make any OLED monitor?
OLED only
you guys seem to know a lot about monitors are there any 16:10 desktop displays worthwhile in 2026 or is that shit dead in the water
>>107821187Go by to plebbit. Plebtard
>>107821187OLED is like lifting the veil, turning content otherwise beyond a milky glazed window into content directly in front of youpeople talk of burn in; personally i haven't seen its impact in 6 years of TV / monitor or phone usagecould it be improved? of course! every year there's something that improves it. this year new OLED monitors are changing their RGB layouts to replicate traditional RGB patterns, suiting desktop environmentsthere's also tandem-OLED which is the future of the tech
>>107821539Doesn't matter if I'm dead, moron
>>107821283I want a future wasteland dweller to be able to use my pc, so I go with ips.
>>107822432Burn-in starts showing after like half a year of normal work. Screen is still usable at that point, but obviously no longer pristine.
>>107825877>LGShould have tried literally any other brand other than the brand known for skimping out on parts and selling literal garbage.
I still use tn, new IPS panels rape my eyes and brain with their trickery.
>>107828477everything i have read on TV buying lately says something like 'avoid LG like the plague because they suck ass' and that anon is out there unironically mad at OLED tech lol
>>107828477>>107828491lg is the company that shills here nonstopall oled sucks. my oled was a samsung panel that burnt indumbass browns
>>107828538failyou have to make all the white parts color match with the eye color, then you get VA's signature black smear
>>107824531How? I never connect mine to the network.
>>107821187I chose Oleg
>>107825460I sit at my PC for 8-12 hours a day and I can barely get 3500 hours a year... 15k would be over 4 years without burn-in.
>>107828434You mean CRT?
>>107828446>claim from a random retardvs>>107821283>claim from a random retard with at least a pictureHMM
>>107826940It will begin in like 6 months. More subtle at first and then gets worse, obviously. Using an OLED screen for 10h at a time is also bad because the stupid things need to run their compensation cycles more frequently than that for "optimal" longevity.>>107827454It's mostly dead. You can still buy various cheap-ish 16:10 monitors, especially at 1920x1200, but in terms of tech / image quality they seem to be very outdated. No high refresh rate, HDR, improved contrast, brightness and so on. The aspect ratio doesn't seem to have made the jump into the "4k" space either, like you cannot find 3840x2400 screens or something, at least not consumer screens with any sort of practical availability.It's basically something of the past, whatever 16:10 PC monitors you can still find have basically stagnated to what they were when this AR was popular. I think you might also find some more 16:10 stuff in the portable monitor category, mostly because these screens tend to be smaller and 16:9 is quite sucky on small screens (not so bad on big displays where you have a lot of vertical space anyway).
>>107822432Burn-In only happens if you are careless. Too many youngster /g/tards never use and even hear of screen savers.
>>107828803The half a year claim is from a documented video where a guy uses an OLED screen for his daily work (mostly document editing / writing IIRC) and periodically records & reports changes as the screen degrades. There is plenty of video evidence of burn-in. Plenty of random anecdotes from people posting pictures of their wrecked screens too, even ITT.>>107828826No it happens no matter what you do, as long as the screen is used, it is degrading. Screensaver is completely useless unless you intend to leave the display on and unused for extremely long periods of time. Even then having a screensaver is still harmful compared to just turning the screen off so it can run its compensation cycle.
>>107828846>There is plenty of video evidence of burn-inSo you're just poor and never had an OLED. Noted.
>>107828870Stop projecting lmao
>>107828846>No it happens no matter what you do, as long as the screen is used, it is degrading.Everything degrades you brainlet. Burn-in is a non-issue if you are not an careless idiot.
>>107828446>>107828805>>107828846>6 months>half a yearLol I love this. I'm the tard with the 3000+ hours and I disabled ALL anti burn-in features plus use it for desktop use 90% of the time, taskbar, window borders, bright wallpaper, etc. Zero burn-in in actual burn-in tests.
>>107828901No way you don't have burn-in. See >>107828846
>>107828920So I have a magical OLED that won't burn-in. Good to know. Thanks.
>>107821187For everyone saying they'd take LCD over OLED, the irony is the LCD backlight will probably from uneven dimming or even burn-out long before the OLED shows burn-in. The reality is modern displays are fundamentally consumer products with finite lifespans.
>>107828920Yes, it is totally fessible. Burn-In is an issue if you are completely careless. OLEDs are much better. They are just a little more fragile then CRTs of old with burn-in. Just use a screen saver and powering off monitor for long idle periods. You are gold.
>>107829018>disable all burn in features>not being careless
>>107829014LOL
>>107829014Entropy eventually wins. Nothing lasts forever.
>>107828901>>107828920>>107828924I don’t get why people keep lying about stuff they’ve never even seen in their lives.“I read about it, I watched a youube video, it’s proven” Sure it is.
>>107829027Yeah. It's an extreme test though, and several of the LCDs look as bad or worse, just in different ways. Pick your poison.
>>107829043>>107828901>I'm the tard with the 3000+ hoursAnd it's not even big milage. I use a TV for almost 9k hours. No sign of burn in. Maybe the brightness loss from some woodoo maintenance, but how would I know?
>>107829027Funniest thing is how some panels look terrible out of the box
>>107829059>And it's not even big milage.I know, but still covers his "half year / 6 months" bullshit.
>>107829075Very true. Would you rather an OLED with a clean uniform panel that might eventually show a bit of burn in after a few years, or an LCD with garbage uniformity from day one?
>>107829147I'm a coping poorfag so I pick LCD and go shit on OLEDs on /g/ instead.
>>107829147I think both heavily burned-in OLED and ununifor LCD panels will look fine with regular content. Hell, my laptop always have some fingerprints and I mostly don't care. But why settle for less? Especially for a thing you use more than 4 hours a day.
>>107821244>>107822432>>107828446my oled is going on 3 years old. 90% productivity. no sign of burn in at all. even if it starts burning in now I'll just buy another I can never go back to non oled.
>>107828924>So I have a magical OLED that won't burn-inMaybe, maybe. More likely though is that you're just a basic bitch who can't tell until it gets so bad it becomes fully obvious. We've had plenty of your kind around every step of the way. Back when the switch to HD and FHD was being made there were plenty of basic bitches around who claimed there was no difference (there is), plenty who claimed there was no difference between 30FPS and 60FPS, or 60FPS and 120FPS, plenty who still to this day claim they cannot tell the difference 4k makes and so on. We've got plenty of them right here on /g/ as well, you're most likely one of them too.
>>107829527If you can't tell if there's burn in, does it matter?
>>107829550Just because YOU can't tell, doesn't mean others can't.
>>107821187Why the fuck can't I get a 4K 32" IPS monitor? Dell has one and it's $1,000 despite being having massive ghosting issues
>>107829527See >>107828901>in actual burn-in tests.
>>107822432on my Galaxy S8 I noticed it after about 5 years and it became exponentially more pronounced over the next 2.
>nooooooo my oled that i will keep for 3 years before upgrading would burn in if i kept it running nonstop for 4 years>im going back to my CRT (that is already burnt in, and has given me eye cancer)>oled is finishedwhy are luddites like this?
>>107829676Did better than my SII. >>107822327
>>107829684Not luddites, poorfags. The argument boils down to cost. It's always "lol dumb consumer oledfag" but in this case consumer = someone who can afford something I can't.
>>107829713Kek, this.
>>107829684>>107829713I mean yeah I'm poor. My current monitor is a decade old. If I buy another one, I want it to last about that long too.
>>107829561I don't know, why can't you?
I got a headache when my dad lended me his Galaxy S5 a decade ago. Are OLEDs still like that?
>>107829555But if it's my monitor, that I use, why should I care if other people can tell if there's burn in if I can't?
>>107830102You don't need to care. The people who think 720p 30FPS is just as good as 2160p 120FPS don't need to care either. You do you. On the other hand however, what you should also do is stop screeching on the internet about how all the many sources of information and the many people who say that OLEDs do in fact burn in are ackshually false and OLED totally doesn't burn in ever for realsies even after 981723 years of static content.
>>107830098Read the thread before posting? >>107822646>>107822673>>107822692
>>107830134Different anon.
>>107830134why did you ignore >>107829607
>>107830134Yeah, you've got the wrong anon. I have an OLED monitor (42" LG C2) with 18k hours on it and all the burn-in preventions disabled (though I use it as a secondary monitor and have my own homebrewed window auto-dimming scripts to use with it) and don't have any noticeable burn in looking at single-color test screens, but I'm not someone who thinks it won't happen eventually. OLED has pros and cons like any technology, and until something else comes along that's able to reproduce high contrast scenes with perfect blacks and no blooming with good viewing angles, there's simply nothing better for viewing content.
>>107821187>Adjusts contrast and saturation
>>107830098works on iPhones, can't speak for andjeet trash
>>107822646all oled phone screens have atrocious pwm dimming at all brightness levels. truly the worst. the OLED TV's and monitors almost all are pwm free.
>>107831034>>107831011
>>107831037what works on iphones? all iphones besides the old se series which use ips have horrific pwm dimming. if you search their support forums you'll find tens of thousands of complaints about it. iphone is the most horrendous garbage of all time
>>107831044lol poor
>>107821187PG32UCDM here0 burn in after 2 and a half years
>>107831052yeah there's been endless tests on that it doesn't work whatsoever. it's almost comical that apple is that stupid. the highest paid engineers in the world are clueless nincompoops
>>107822386you probably miss the 200+ PPI (text quality), its hard to find. I bet you dont miss the 60hz though.Supposedly Apple is upgrading the Studio Display to support 120hz this year, maybe look into that but have fun spending 2k+ on it
>>107831054Usage? You should see the first signs in half a year when your warranty expires
I love how this anon (or maybe a different anon) points to some random dude’s YouTube video or forum posts and just ignores the actual experiences people are sharing in this thread.>>107829527>More likely though is that you're just a basic bitch who can't tell until it gets so bad it becomes fully obvious.So he's a basic bitch because he uses the best display technology there is? Huh.>>107830048>My current monitor is a decade old. If I buy another one, I want it to last about that long too.Why? Cheap monitors are now start from $70.>>107830098I had a headache with Note 3. Don't have any complains with current phones and TVs. >>107831072>>107822386Look into Chinese 5K glossy monitors.
>>107831066works on my machine
>>107831106no, no it doesn't and that's a fact
>>107831086>You should see the first signs in half a year when your warranty expiresThat literally is 2 and a half years.
>>107831127and 0 burn in
>>10783111599.99% of the population can use a 17 pro with no negative side effectsthe majority of the remaining people who complain about pwm dimming are schizos that think the government is remotely beaming painful radio waves into their head
>>107831129actually you're wrong at a bare minimum 20% of the population suffers from pwm and it's likely much higher than that but the avg person sadly doesn't realize their iDogshit is giving the migraines and mental disorders case in point you an absurd nutcase defending the worst garbage ever made like a Stockholm syndrome victim I'd feel sorry for you but you're a lying shithead so I'd probably murder you irl instead and enjoy ever second of it
will microleds solve the burn in problem?
>>107831149>actually you're wrong>has a complete schizo melty
>>107831187oh wait let me guess your post was fun the one where you're lying and gaslighting simultaneously about a well known problem. virtually no desktop monitors are sold with pwm because it's such a vast and we'll known complaint. nearly every single person who had spent time in front of a pwn display complained about. you acting like there's no problem is the problem.
>>107831178No. They burn in too but just slower.
>>107831178Yes, your life will be burned away before those leds do.
I hate pwm
>>107821187Given that there are no longer any actually good IPS monitors, it seems like the shift to OLED is inevitable at this point.
>>107821187VA, a 5000:1 contrast is good enough for me.>inb4 ghostingDon't notice any on my panel.
I have an OLED monitor, had it for about a year and a half nowMy biggest issues are ABL and brightness flickeringEverything else is amazing about it
>>107828805The best you can do these days is that 4k IPS 2:3 panel by BenQ (and Huawei, but get the BenQ)
>>107821187>OLEDburn in>IPSglow/trash blacks>VAghostingpick your fucking poison
>>107832040New OLEDs will easily go 5 years minimum. Stop being a poorsissie
>>107832055weird because any model that is at least 1 year old will have pics of burn in posted somewherebut thats because theyre careless. they should have known better when buying a "luxury" that the luxury you get is a mildly improved image which you get to baby and worry about.lmao he spent 1k on oled and touched the brightness setting? he let sunlight get on it? haha noob. should have left oled to us brahmin kings
>>107832470>[Schizophrenic brown babble]
>>107831097There's no point in buying a new cheap monitor. It should be better than what I currently have.
>>107821187IPS if you are poor.High-end IPS if you have money but is too lazy or too retarded to use burn-in protection features, and wants to keep your garbage static tranime avatar on screen 24/7. If you look at the picture posted by the schizo ITT, you will realize it all comes from either unrealistic stress testing or retards like I already described. He never owned OLED btw.High-end OLED if you have money over 100 IQ as a bare minimum. The anti-OLED poojets ITT doesn't have either.
>>107833953*money and over 100 IQ
>>107831097Thanks for the tip I will check some chink monitor in the hopes I can enjoy using my fucking machine again...
>>107822465I sold it because the iMac was sluggish... And I also because I must consoom
>>107821187IPS: Reliable, consistent brightness, no burn-in risk, better for productivity, generally more affordable. OLED: Perfect blacks, superior contrast, vibrant colors, faster response, but risk of burn-in and often more expensive.
>>107834188Sorry that I didn't mentioned a name. They can be placed under different brands. I remember one of them being KTC. Look like Apple Pro Display rip off. Monitors are good though. It's the same panel as in 5k imacs and it's less than $1000
I've recently bought an IPS 4k 180Hz display, instead of an OLED, mainly because I also use the monitor for work (which includes hours of reading and writing documents), and thus I was afraid of prematurely ruining the screen with burn in.
I am about to buy an Open Box PG27UCDM from Best Buy... What the fuck am I in for ?
S-PVA
thinking about picking up a 55" sony bravia 8 to replace my ~10 year old 4k 48" vizio. should i?
>>107821187OLED would be great without the O
