What are you working on, /g/?Previous: >>107817026
>>107840984Trying to derive a realistic CRT shader from the physics of how a CRT works. I believe I got the basics of it correctly but it doesn't look very convincing so far.
>>107841022You should emulate an NTSC video output perhaps (if you weren't planning on doing that already), maybe look at the blargg shader
>>107841035I did a NTSC shader once upon a time that looked sorta convincing. It wasn't so hard because the most characteristic artifacts stem directly from the math of decoding the signal. What I want to do here is to capture the look produced by the CRT itself, without a degraded signal. Unsurprisingly, that proves to be harder.
posting this again, didn't realize the other thread was dedI've been on emacs for a long time, wanted to try vim, can I just use straight ahead raw vim? I kinda quit emacs because I was wasting too much time configuring shit now only to look at the vim side and be bombarded with neovim bullshit and learning lua, using some kind of neovim "distrobution" that relies on a bunch of random shit and random keybinds, or using doom emacs but then I'm still on fucking emacs. I thought vim itself... did pretty much everything? is most of the neovim stuff just to be fancy or slightly easier? I don't get it.
>>107841022have you considered a sub-pixel resolution for your shader?
>>107841059How intense is the bloom on your shader? That's an aspect of CRTs that I feel most emulations fail to replicate. (Both the effect where the picture will shrink or grow depending on how bright it as, and the light that comes off of the phosphor)
>>107841092Neovim mainly adds modern features and nicer plugin ecosystems, but none of it is required. Have fun with plain ol' Vim.
>>107840984First for name me a Cool Programming Language
>>107841022That's a cool project.The linux mint distribution I used a decade ago had a screensaver like that. It was really cool.
>>107841503COBOL
>>107841503>Cool Programming LanguageCoProLang
I implemented a first version of >>107795283the syntax got more complex because I also wanted to better structure the output, but I'm reasonably satisfied with how I'm mixing the text matching itself and building up the result
>>107841503Joyor Om if your autistic
>>107842338kind of cool but also seems extremely brittle - the input will have to strictly adhere to a consistent grammar for such rules to work
