[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/g/ - Technology

Name
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.
  • You may highlight syntax and preserve whitespace by using [code] tags.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: cat-smug-face.gif (49 KB, 310x280)
49 KB
49 KB GIF
wine IS an emulator tho
>>
>>107845921
An emulator is called an emulator because it emulates physical hardware, such as PPSSPP and melonDS.
Wine is a compatability layer that allows for windows apps to work on other systems, hence the name: Wine Is Not an Emulator (WINE)
>>
>>107845921
what is it emulating then?
>>
>>107845959
By other systems I am referring to other operating systems, mainly Linux.
Wine does nothing about hardware and does not emulate it.
>>
>>107845921
and gnu is gun.
>>
>>107845959
Wine emulates x86 on x86. Just because there's no implementation doesn't mean it's not an emulator.
>>
it is not an emulator
https://werat.dev/blog/how-wine-works-101/
>>
>>107845988
It literally doesn't and youre retarded, it translates windows syscalls to Linux syscalls
>>
>>107845959
OP btfo
>>
>>107846004
translation = emulation
>>
>>107846004
It doesn't even "translate" them, it's just another implementation other than microsoft's. It's like saying musl "translates" glibc
>>
>>107845921
True.
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.os.linux.misc/c/_g3F2H4ieDc/m/GKeIZCuOev0J

Originally named 'Wine' by co-creator Bob Amstadt. Wine was a shortened version of winemu (or WINdows EMUlator)
>My orignal line of thinking was "winemu", but I didn't like that. Then I thought of shortening it to "wine". This led me to think of "whine" and "whinny". I liked "whine", but felt that it was too long

This was because one of the main features of Wine is a high-level emulation library
>b) The second part of the finished product is an emulation library, which takes calls to Windows functions, and somehow translates these into calls to X11
>A very minimal version of the emulation library has been merged with the loader. -Bob [Amstadt]

After a discussion about Sun's Wabi, it was believed that Sun changed the internal name from WABI (Windows Application Binary Interface) to avoid any legal troubles from using the 'Windows' trademark.
>I have talked Face to Face with a sun representitive who told me "Wabi does not stand for anything". He then went on to explain that they did want it to stand for Windows Application Binary Interface. but their lawyers told them they better not
>"Formally announced in May, but previewed late last year, WABI acutally stands for (Microsoft) Windows Application Binary Interface ..." SunWorld, June 1993, p 22. There is also a similar statement in the April issue of SUnWorld

They decided they should follow suit and avoid essentially calling it 'Windows Emulator.'
>For those of us in the user community, the threat of Microsquishy winning their appeal to have the word "Windows" trademarked is mostly irrelevant. But perhaps the Linux group should consider calling their version of Wabi "WAW" ("WAW ain't Windows(tm)"). This would preserve the grand old tradition of recursive acronyms, and would also be a good nose-thumbing at the sorry gits in Redmond.

That is when "Wine Is Not an Emulator" was first suggested.
>>
>>107845921
I'd just like to interject for a moment. What you're refering to as Linux, is in fact, GNU/Linux, or as I've recently taken to calling it, GNU plus Linux. Linux is not an operating system unto itself, but rather another free component of a fully functioning GNU system made useful by the GNU corelibs, shell utilities and vital system components comprising a full OS as defined by POSIX.

Many computer users run a modified version of the GNU system every day, without realizing it. Through a peculiar turn of events, the version of GNU which is widely used today is often called Linux, and many of its users are not aware that it is basically the GNU system, developed by the GNU Project.

There really is a Linux, and these people are using it, but it is just a part of the system they use. Linux is the kernel: the program in the system that allocates the machine's resources to the other programs that you run. The kernel is an essential part of an operating system, but useless by itself; it can only function in the context of a complete operating system. Linux is normally used in combination with the GNU operating system: the whole system is basically GNU with Linux added, or GNU/Linux. All the so-called Linux distributions are really distributions of GNU/Linux!



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.