Check out my voxel engine anons. Written in C++ using OpenGL. Infinite world in every direction, including up and down. Not even close to complete yet, but I'm proud of what I've done so far.
>>107846997I could Vibe Code that with Claude Opus in like 10 minutes tops.
>>107846997That's neat.However, considering the framerate, it seems like you're doing something very wrong. You should get more like 2,000 fps, not 20 fps.
>>107846997kek I know you vibe coded this b/c I unironically just did the exact same project a couple days ago
>>107846997very cool anon
>>107846997in the 90s you'd get immediately hired for valve or idsoftware, now it's just ai react app slop
>>107846997Based vibecoder
>>107847035prob lack of culling, since there's not (supposed to have) much logic going on every frame at that point in the game.or doing a bunch of draw calls using the same texture but binding it every time, setting the shader program every draw call, etc. but I don't know shit about graphics
>>107846997Nice 20 FPS, faggot.
>>107847140It's not doing draw calls for every block, it's doing meshing but it isn't greedy meshing and there isn't any frustum culling yet
>>107847178You only need to mesh once unless a block gets removed or added.
>>107847027>>107847036>>107847058Yes it is vibecoded using GPT-5 miniIt took about three days to get to this point>>107847198It actually is meshing once and then reusing the meshes. Idk at the moment what the performance bottleneck is but I'm going to figure it out at some point. It is rendering a 7 x 7 x 7 cube of 16 x 16 chunks so obviously there are a lot of vertices
>>107847237>obviously there are a lot of verticesthere shouldn't be. anyway there are some great tools that will tell you exactly how much time is being spent in what function and when called from what other function, so it'll give you an idea pretty quickly about what's wrong
>>107847237honestly good job!3 days is not bad, and way better than most programmers could do
>>107846997>really basic minecraft clone with two blocks>20fpsThe fuck have you done
>>107846997Is it actually voxels though? It looks like regular old triangles to me.
This is a waste of time. If you coded it yourself you might have actually learned something.Go read about opengl. It's really obvious why your frames are so bad. But good luck having gpt refactor that for you.>>107847485>>107847438Dumb as fuck...
>>107847438>>107847237>voxels>vertices No.
