>he still uses a shartphone
that's the face id laser dumbass
@grok is this true
>>107847586so it's okay because it's an infrared photograph, not a regular (visible light) photograph?
>>107847632It's not a photo.
>>107847728What is it then? A scan?
>>107847586Lol what. The "laser" lights up the face to then be read by nothing? You know how scanning something works, right? The data doesn't flow back through the "laser" like some alien tractor beam.