What's the most accurate tech prediction you've heard in the past 10 or so years?Here's a post on a blog from 2014. Creepy.
>don't use better product>instead of improving... jews are behind this
Firefox wouldn't exist without google funding. It only exists to prevent antitrust lawsuits.
>>107852853google couldn't even prevent the return of the drumpf.https://www.bitchute.com/video/JwEhxfBAhxt5
>>107852918>drumpf>bitchuteBeyond cringe
>>10785285342% of Rust users will die by their own hand.
>>107852918schizo-video, whoever made that needs meds.
>>107852853One again I'll remind everyone that when Firefox was at its peak, most people hadn't installed it because they wanted, it was power users who installed Firefox on their dad's computer or told their friends to use it because it was "better."Firefox didn't die because Google magically convinced everyone to install Chrome, it died because those recommendations stopped, and they stopped because at some point Firefox wasn't "better" anymore.Asinine decisions like abandoning XUL and adopting crippled webextensions instead, or like making extension signing obligatory, absolutely killed any love anyone could have for Firefox. It wasn't a browser you could use for anything anymore, you could only use it as Mozilla wanted. Recommending Firefox when it meant freedom was one thing, but who would want to tell his auntie to use Firefox when you don't like it anymore?Chrome didn't win, there was never a competition to begin with because Firefox killed itself. Everyone, every single soul at Mozilla knows it, because when they announced the deprecation of add-ons that actually worked Bugzilla was full to the brim with posts saying that exactly, literally this would happen. So, yeah, fuck off with your prediction, Mozilla could have prevented this. They are the ones who didn't listen.
>>107852853>Be worse>"Choose us because we are not the other guy!" This is always a losing strategy, you need to actually be better if you want to win and being better does not seem to be Firefox's style. I hope Ladybird ends up being good.
>>107852964Re-read the post you just made.
>>107853094My memory is that Firefox was better than IE and early Chrome, but around 2009/2010 Chrome was much faster and more stable. I forget the other reasons that made me switch but Firefox didn't become usable to me again until a few years ago and it's still quirky/broken in some ways beyond the obvious "websites only built/tested for Chrome"
>>107852853People have been saying this for years but google just keeps making a better product I wish I could use opera or Firefox but they run like shit
>>107853094>Firefox didn't die because Google magically convinced everyone to install ChromeI think the billions in advertising and bundling it in random third-party installers might have contributed a bit.
>>107853180>operaChromium spyware with Chinese characteristics
>>107853124It's still a valid argument though and that is in fact why I'm still using firefox, despite it being a shit browser, because I am not about to submit to chrome dominance.But yeah I really hope Ladybird comes through with something decent, cause fuck firefox, mozilla is full of fags and retards.
>>107853124>pay OEMs>they give chrome better access to device resources >mugh chrome is betterKek
>>107853253What a weird thing to make up.
>>107852853If monopolies were so bad then they wouldn't keep on popping up
>>107853994>If drugs destroyed lives, then people wouldn't do drugs.
>>107852853>here's a prediction from 2014 which hasn't come true yet...ok?
>>107852853This was common tech talk in 2014 not some nostadramus type prediction. Now if this comment was made back in 2010 it would have been an era prediction. >>107853094Firefox dominated because IE was garbage. 2006-2011. 2012 was the last year Firefox was respected by normies. After that its been a Chromium worl.d