is uBO Lite actually better than uBO because you can configure it to be less invasive?
>>107868239Yes blocking less ads is good for you
>>107868272but you have the same filter lists in lite
>>107868239Not really. Adblockers have to be invasive to work, because any technology available to the website author is usable for creating what could reasonably be considered an advertisement. With that said if gorhill wanted to draw a somewhat useful trustliness distinction he could have a tier above basic and below optimal that contained only dNR and CSS rules and no scriptlets.
Are you smarter because your room temperature IQ produces less thoughts and is therefore less wasteful?
>>107868239It doesn't work for me on youtube for some reason.
>>107868239>t. what makes uBO lite lite?
>>107869331Basic network filtering doesn't work on youtube, you need optimal or complete mode.
