why do figures who reject clean code, code like shit?
>>107876671the only person that will ever love him is his own mother.
fuck off, blowstop autofellating on 4gay, no one cares about your 20 y.o. flash games or pet dogshit language
>>107876671clean code is dogs->yanderedevok you have a point BUT he was still a shit programmer
>>107876671That shit looks like the typical retarded trash written by "clean code" advocates.
>>107876805having thousands of nested ifs is not something clean code advocades would do, though
>>107876671>resolve_constant_expression_to_type_or_return_null_if_we_should_yield69 (nice) character function name. Would 80-characters-per-line boomers die if they saw this nonsense?
>>107876845if statements are as clean as it gets, you're basically writing in binary at that point.
>>107876671K&R style braces are fucking mental illness. This is shit code but even this would look a thousand times better if he just used Allman.
No wonder Jonathan BLOWS hates Clean Code and the gang of 4 design patterns book. Now im starting to understan why it's taking him 10 years to finish some basic ass puzzle game
>>107876671he's the definition of "do as i say, not as i do".
>>107876671doesn't this shovel-faced faggot have like 20 hours of commentary on his game's anniversary edition?
>>107876845it's not about the if-statements, retard. it's abourt readability. nesting that deep is not clean code.clean code would be extracting the inner blocks to a method with a name that indicates what it does.
>>107876671>// We are actuallye fine!lmao, the only comment he bothered to write is completely useless to anybody but himself. what a retard.
