What would happen if the big tech companies came together and decided to end support for anyone using an adblocker? Banning people for days or weeks at a time for instance.
Adblocking is already against Google tos it just doesn't seem to be enforced very much. Microsoft does not seem to care about adblocking, in fact they include ABP in Edge mobile.
>>107880690We go outside.I've seen my sister's YouTube without u block and horrey shit. If ublock stops working ,my life will most definitely change to being less on the pc, so doesn't matter if you ban or it gets disabled. Ads and pop ups were slowly introduced so people didn't notice, they were trained to accept the cancer. Slowly growing and spreading effecting their perception pushing their boundaries. Ad block people have it good, and it's hard to imagine that if suddenly everything were to be cutoff, they would be willing to jump into a pool of shit instead of choosing to just sit outside.To top it up with u'd need to deal with ADs + ai dog shit content.The late 90 and early 2000s are coming back, chill with the boys, hang with ppl you know and taking it easy because the internet is coming to a halt
>>107880690People would come together and decide to end support for big tech companies.Well, let's be real, one person out of a thousand, the others would just obey. :(
>>107880690DNS
>>107880690Line would go down
>>107880690>implying the numbers that people get charged by ad services aren't all fake to begin with.All that would change is people wouldn't able to access these sites without disabling javascript or finding an alternative.
In this scenario the tech company that doesn't follow the group would gain user market share.The users that were banned from other platforms would go to whatever is still available. Depending on the length of the ban, completely changing their routine, permanently fucking over themselves.
>>107880817>>107880817Then we'll slap ad posters all over your walls and lock them in place with superglue.They'll be stuck on using glue meant to last.And if you somehow manage to tear them down or paint over them, we'll drag you straight into court.And we won't be gentle about it.
>>107880690You won't do shit.
>>107880690>Banning people for days or weeks at a timethose people may have a big think in their digital gulag and come to the conclusion that social media and youtube is not all that importantI refuse to be mindraped by marketing goons. No adblock = no internet. simple as
>>107880936But that is going to the old ways, they always want to advertise as much as aggressively possible. But laws get put because it's fucking annoying(at least in some places). Outside visable to everyone would be much harder to shit everywhere and have no backlash. Convince the neighbourhood grannies and u got yourself a protest group. But on the internet? "Fuckoff it's not a real place". Or maybe some tech savvy politicians come in to play and clean up the internet infustructure for home country
>>107880690It would be extremely based to see normies losing their shit over a non-issue like this while I sit comfortably behind my Hyphanet node.
