AMD bros....I don't feel so good. Our response AMD bros?Not even 360hz without pulsar off can even compare to 240hz pulsar on.It's just so crisp in motion.
>>107893071idk what that is im a 60/144 fps gamer
Anno at 95fps, imagine it higher. Pulsar off vs on.Its so fucking over. AMD monitors are officially the budget blurry poor option again, not even FSR4 could save AMD's reputation until they release a competitor.
>>107893096In high refresh rate FPS games even if you have a 9800X3D/9070XT you still need a good monitor with frames at 240fps+ to get low blur.
cs pros will still turn all this shit off and click heads on 1280x960 stretched regardless. solution seeking a problem
>>107893071>jeet-sync pulsaar
Its so fucking over even 95hz with pulsar on fucking MOGS 360hz with pulsar off.Its official if you don't have a monitor with pulsar technology or similar you might as well not even buy that monitor.
>backlight strobbingholy cancer
I'm waiting for nanosecond pixel response times and 1,000hz displays as well as games designed to run at 1,000fps+ anything less is a total failure
It's comical how easy it is to make retards part ways with their money.
>no more blur>game adds motion blur anywayscurrent year
>>107893071Pulsar is a gimmick. S&H will always have blur. It is a fundamental limitation on how they work.
>>107893071is pulsar coming to the masses or would it be a high end bullshit?is not that difficult to implemente, so amd could do the equivalent of freesync if nvidia is retarded about it
>>107893071>>107893139Does anyone actually have one of these monitors here to give some real impressions? Im not dropping 650 on something that will eventually just be in almost every monitor (including budget ones) like normal g-sync is.
>>107894039I'm sorry buddy, CRTs are a dead technology.
>>10789307160Hz is all you need.
