>'We're ready to go,' Nasa crew say as rocket inches closer to launch padAre you hyped?https://youtu.be/nrVnsO_rdew
>>107894334Space flight isn't real.
>>107894334Launch time?
>>107894364>The earliest launch window for the approximately 10-day mission around the Moon opens on Friday, Feb. 6.OP sucks.
>>107894334Wow I can't believe that 57 years after they totally sent a rocket to the moon for real trust me bro, now they're ready to launch a rocket that will be near the moon. Isn't tech absolutely amazing?
>>107894401post skin
I remember hearing about this program years ago, 2026 being the scheduled year and it seemed so distant in time, yet here we are already
>>107894334NASA lies and it's all fake CGI and practical effects. Watch them memory hole all of this because how obvious it will be.
>>107894394>OP sucks.I am posting this early because I am checking out places where I can watch it live, that's why the image. preparation is king my fren
>>107894469What's so special about the inside of a fairing?
>>107894469If it’s fake, then what did they do with all the money?
>>107894507DUMBs
>>107894469yeah, they rendered it all with nVidia powered openAI simulations, back in 1969.
>>107894640Well obviously not, they did it in a sound studio with huge lights to light up the studio, the astronauts had a pulley system to simulate low gravity, which had really shitty fails in a lot of images.
>>107894693Yeah, and then they broadcast it to the entire planet. Taking into account celestial movement, radio coverage, transmission delay, and which broadcast station could receive the signal proper given the position of Earth, the time of day, and the "supposed" position of the spaceships.All with 1969, pre-internet, full analog tech.
>>107894770>Taking into account celestial movement,No stars in any photographs or video>radio coverageAll stations forced to record feed at mission control instead of live feed>transmission delayGot caught multiple times responding to mission control without delay>which broadcast station could receive the signal proper given the position of EarthSee above
>>107894693Looks like there is a bit of a raise in the terrain there that is blocking part of the shadow.Do you have a higher resolution image?
>>107894334>Are you hyped?https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QOS6kfR9u4s
>>107894809Whatever you say
>>107894846Corrected version
>>107894789>No stars in any photographs or videoLearn how cameras work.>All stations forced to record feed at mission control instead of live feedno, they had different antennas receiving the broadcast at different times, from the top of my head there was a large antenna in Australia, they made a Sam Neill movie about it.>Got caught multiple times responding to mission control without delayyeah, and the earth is flat.
>>107894881there is zero reason to argue with these mentally brain damaged people. USSR just admitting the US made it to the moon. Most basic shit
>>107894846>posts a different imageFucking I swear.Anyway, what seems to be happening is that the foreground rocks are raised up a bit which is causing distortion in the shadows. Other ones nearby (generally smaller rocks) seem to have more straight rightward shadows.
>>107894401You're doing the equivalent of a nicotine junkie lighting cigarette butts he finds in parking lots for the tiny bit of remaining tobacco.
>>107894401no one else has done it, so it will be pretty impressive given how brown and full of migger creekshitting jew lovers this place is.
