>'We're ready to go,' Nasa crew say as rocket inches closer to launch padAre you hyped?https://youtu.be/nrVnsO_rdew
>>107894334Space flight isn't real.
>>107894334Launch time?
>>107894364>The earliest launch window for the approximately 10-day mission around the Moon opens on Friday, Feb. 6.OP sucks.
>>107894334Wow I can't believe that 57 years after they totally sent a rocket to the moon for real trust me bro, now they're ready to launch a rocket that will be near the moon. Isn't tech absolutely amazing?
>>107894401post skin
I remember hearing about this program years ago, 2026 being the scheduled year and it seemed so distant in time, yet here we are already
>>107894334NASA lies and it's all fake CGI and practical effects. Watch them memory hole all of this because how obvious it will be.
>>107894394>OP sucks.I am posting this early because I am checking out places where I can watch it live, that's why the image. preparation is king my fren
>>107894469What's so special about the inside of a fairing?
>>107894469If it’s fake, then what did they do with all the money?
>>107894507DUMBs
>>107894469yeah, they rendered it all with nVidia powered openAI simulations, back in 1969.
>>107894640Well obviously not, they did it in a sound studio with huge lights to light up the studio, the astronauts had a pulley system to simulate low gravity, which had really shitty fails in a lot of images.
>>107894693Yeah, and then they broadcast it to the entire planet. Taking into account celestial movement, radio coverage, transmission delay, and which broadcast station could receive the signal proper given the position of Earth, the time of day, and the "supposed" position of the spaceships.All with 1969, pre-internet, full analog tech.
>>107894770>Taking into account celestial movement,No stars in any photographs or video>radio coverageAll stations forced to record feed at mission control instead of live feed>transmission delayGot caught multiple times responding to mission control without delay>which broadcast station could receive the signal proper given the position of EarthSee above
>>107894693Looks like there is a bit of a raise in the terrain there that is blocking part of the shadow.Do you have a higher resolution image?
>>107894334>Are you hyped?https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QOS6kfR9u4s
>>107894809Whatever you say
>>107894846Corrected version
>>107894789>No stars in any photographs or videoLearn how cameras work.>All stations forced to record feed at mission control instead of live feedno, they had different antennas receiving the broadcast at different times, from the top of my head there was a large antenna in Australia, they made a Sam Neill movie about it.>Got caught multiple times responding to mission control without delayyeah, and the earth is flat.
>>107894881there is zero reason to argue with these mentally brain damaged people. USSR just admitting the US made it to the moon. Most basic shit
>>107894846>posts a different imageFucking I swear.Anyway, what seems to be happening is that the foreground rocks are raised up a bit which is causing distortion in the shadows. Other ones nearby (generally smaller rocks) seem to have more straight rightward shadows.
>>107894401You're doing the equivalent of a nicotine junkie lighting cigarette butts he finds in parking lots for the tiny bit of remaining tobacco.
>>107894401no one else has done it, so it will be pretty impressive given how brown and full of migger creekshitting jew lovers this place is.
>>107894856There is another way to make features like this appear larger and further spaced apart in a frame and that's to take the photo from a position closer to them.
>>107894693>which had really shitty fails in a lot of images.yephttps://www.aulis.com/stereoparallax.htm
>>107894401post (slant) eyes
>>107894334did they manage to come up with actual goals worth putting people at risk or is it still just because the orange man wants to stroke his ego
>>107896075she's not going to fuck you just because you go to the bernie rallies with her
>>107895687>take two steps to the right>take another photoI don't get it.
>>107896222whatit didn't come across well but I'm genuinely interested in what they want to get out of a trip to the moon, other than because the man on high demands it
>>107894881>>107894901>You know it's real because it looks so fakeNASA has been caught so many times it's obvious they're lying pieces of shit.Imagine raping the tax payers for billions of dollars then when they come asking for the original data saying>whoops! We recorded over those tapes because we had a tape shortage! Our bad!>We'd go back in a heartbeat but we destroyed the technology!LMAOAll one has to do is look at pictures of the LEM to see it's a badly built model. There are shower curtains and scotch tape on it for fucks sake.Then there are the obvious faked later missions where the shuttles were launching obvious models. Oh and the 101 times they got caught on the ISS live feed and were forced to cut the feed.The logo is a snake tongue for crying out loud lmao. They even murdered the Apollo 1 astronauts because they were talking so much shit about the sad state of affairs.But let's be real. You don't want to see evidence. You're just going to parrot the same lies you fags always do then pretend everyone with eyes to see believe in your controlled op flat earth bullshit.
>>107896287I mean ultimately, it comes down to energy solutions and materials.
>>107896287there are no blacks on the moon>>107896666checked check check 'em
>ArtemisWhy are they like this? Fucking cringe. Use names from your own mythology. Oh wait, lmao
>>107897819>Why are they like this?They're part of a cult that worships pagan Gods. It is their culture.
>>107897863Yes how dare they pay tribute to gods white people created. They need to worship the Jewish YHWH instead!!
Hyped as fuck, got my virtual boarding pass and everything.
>>107897940>He thinks the greek and roman Gods were created by white peopleMan you fags really don't read history books do you? All they have to do is change their name and you think it's something different.
>>107897960Please, you’re a jewsus cocksucker trying to discredit whites. You faggots who go on about muh Saturn are in the same tier of schizo nonsense as the flat earth faggots
>>107898014stimming digits and you're a faggot
>>107898093kwaboat
>>107894507the original program's money went mainly to the minuteman. plus the whole NASA show wasn't cheap.
>>107898014Mystery Babylon. Something you don't seem to know anything about.>Jewsus cocksuckerIt's ironic that you're accusing someone of this while defending the blood drinking cult's Gods.Read a book nigger. Let me guess. It's "schizo shit". You don't even know about Gods from 2,000-3,000 years ago when they go back 12,000+ years.Just wait until you find out about the story of Isis and how she made a golden cock.
>>107894856>he just found out about camera lenses What’s puberty like so far, any surprises?
>>107896554>LEM>There are shower curtains and scotch tape on it for fucks sake.Even if there was fuckin cardboard on the outside there'd be nothing wrong with that, because aside from the internal pressure vessel, the motors and the landing gear, the LEM didn't need to be sturdy, it would in fact be detrimental as it'd noticeably increase the mass.
>>107898507>It didn't need to be sturdy bro>Everyone is cool with flying through the vacuum of space with one sheet of tin-foil between them and disasterI guess they were just really really lucky that no stray piece of anything didn't poke a hole in it. Amazing luck to go up so many times without an issue.The astronots were also master contortionist since they managed to change into their EVA suits in such a cramped space. Oh and don't forget the amazing A/C and heating unit which could keep the temperature very comfortable for days at a time running on shitty lightweight 1960s era car batteries (gotta save weight bro) in 200+F degree weather. Same goes for their mobile units attached to their space suits.Plenty of room to store a fucking moon truck too.Imagine defending this shit lmao.
>>107896278The background which is supposedly miles away shouldn't be moving.
>>107894693>moon landing didn't happen because some details in the photo/broadcasts are unusualmuch evidence wow
>>107894334Remind me why they had to do a lunar fly-by with mannequins on board, instead of people, with Artemis I.Why was it so important to measure the radiation and test new "radiation vests", when radiation exposure was not an issue for Apollo missions?
>>107895687>https://www.aulis.com/stereoparallax.htmNice find. Thank you.
>>107901809>because some detailsYou need to watch "American Moon": https://luogocomune.net/americanmoon
>>107903356>hey this photo is weird therefore the moon landing never happened: the movienope
>>107894901you don't understand anon, he has pictures with arrows on them.
>>107898800You're retarded
