whats wrong with AI? it will benefit us eventually...
>>107899514Are you getting paid per thread or per post?
>>107899527per post
>>107899538Makes sense
>>107899514It make idiots like you believe their cause and opinion is justified and righteous because now they can word it better with some fancy visual aid that came with no effort, instead of actually trying to convince and recruit people with actual skills to do this.
>>107899514Useful to generate your futa bbc hypno sissy cancer? Kys you fucking vermin
How do?
>>107899514>whats wrong with AI? it will benefit us eventually...
>>107899514
>>107899514the biggest lack right now is that you don't build a kind of associative model of a scene and then it takes a shot of the model, instead it just generates the entire scene absent a model. you need a vector skeleton that can be tweaked, and then diffusion inpaints over, that way you can get permanence across iterations as well as refresh iterative degredation. the other thing it needs is an automatic critic layer that analyzes drafts and suggests ways to improve them.
theres way too much retard shit and hype in ai. its probably going to take the bubble to burst first before they can push it much farther forward. it was the same way with the internet
>>107899514Cats have been jumping for thousands of years, being way cuter and funnier than any CGI ever have done. And yet you come here to post a picture of a fake cat that was generated by a machine, in the hopes of convincing us that the machine is beneficial. And then you ask us what we thing is wrong with AI? AI is not the problem, the problem is (YOU)
literally every single current big name in ai is simply standing on the shoulders of deepseek, who invented chain of thought. it had nothing to do with leather jacket man pretending to be a rockstar
