>use openai api to have chatgpt generate 64 versions of the code you want and pick the winner in a march madness style tournament why are vibe coders not doing this? are they just too lazy?
>>107910187Who's gonna pick the winner? You wanna do 64 code reviews on the same feature?
>>107910255are you retarded? i said use the openai api>round 1>32 pairs of code files>for each pair, have the prompt be something like "you are a code reviewer, your job is to pick the better one"
>>107910265>are you retardedThe proceeding information you gave after that very clearly shows which one of us two is the retard. Always a frogposter.
>>107910187Vibe coders should be picking the best out of 64 methods to rope themselves.
>>107910265>trusting AI to actually test the code
>>107910187It's fun to think of creative uses of LLMs.Generally when you use AI to code, you don't just make a single API request and expect it to output the code all at once. You use an "agent" which results in a long series of messages with tool use requests, tool use responses, reasoning blocks, etc. It greps through the codebase, makes changes to various files, reviews compiler errors and linter warnings...You could do that 64 times in parallel, with 64 different instances of the entire development environment needed for the project (probably in containers) and then judge them. It would be complex to set up, and obviously expensive.
>>107910187- Generate 2048 different decision trees- Fuse the predictions of all trees- Results outperform SOTA neural net model> too lazyNo, they're too poor. 64x the troughput is 64x the cost. Also, I assume this is what the services do on the backend already.
>>107910187This is effectively what Gas Town isIt is extremely expensive right now. If it takes 50k tokens to complete a coding task with one agent, you now need ~5M tokens
>>107910187they already do this, just one at a time
>>107913361Yeah in my experience it just bullshits you >u sure this last change won't fuck anything up?>SURE I TESTED 2000 SCENARIOS IT'S PERFECT>try it out myself>immediate crash
>>107916596>oopsy whoopsy I did a fuckie wuckie tehe
>>107916596well yeah of course it never tested it it's a text predicting chatbotask your toaster next time to run your code
>>107910187i do this, but not until 64. less then 10 and not using chatgpt.
