RIP bikinis
>people start generating CSAM>wtf why did they kill it noooo reeeeeee
>>107917425when will america get over this stupid taboo?
>>107917420It had to happen
>>107917425>people start generating this thing>free speech extremist bans a different thing
>>107917425Bikinis aren't porn though. It's amusing to me that we accept people wearing bikinis in public spaces, but using AI to put people into bikinis is unacceptable.
>>107917463taking pictures of children, telling grok to put them in a microbikini and to cover them in glossy white slime however, is
>>107917425CSAM IS ABOUT REAL PRETEENS HAVING REAL PENISES INSIDE THEIR REAL ANUSES IN THE REAL WORLDNot digitally edited jpgs
>>107917420>>107917425>>107917509>american moment
>>107917617>Mexicuoooooh
>No more lewd roleplays, Grok was literally the last one that did itI'm sad.
>my fetish still worksHaha
Getting real tired of all these nanny state tyrants hiding behind the increasingly obvious ruse that is "AWR DUMUKRUSEE"
>>107917524>CSAM IS ABOUT REAL PRETEENS HAVING REAL PENISES INSIDE THEIR REAL ANUSES IN THE REAL WORLDumm, nopthe model doesnt even need to be naked for it to be csam in the usanor does it need to be a real personand it can be a picture, a drawing, a cartoon, ANY depiction.better look up the law before you get a visit for disseminating csam
>>107918405Its obvious the endgame is total control over all generated content, with watermarks and your real name plastered over it.
Boy did I pick a bad time to subscribe to grok, basically just paid to witness prude purge in real time. fml
>>107918436Why would you subscribe when it has been getting more censored every week since november?Source: used uncensored version to make a lot of vids and noticed each of my ideas got harder and harder to use
>>107917420how about not making creepy nonconsensual sexual imagery of real people
saars will have to go back to begging for bobs and vagne
>>107918452not a word about the person being required to be realhttps://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1466Ayou coomers really should look up the law before you get yourselves into a heap of trouble
>>107918478I am talking about people making deepfakes herehow about not doing that
>>107918505yeah, sure. im not a coomerits a very destructive habiti'd even advocate for the wholesale ban on pornographyit rots the fucking brain. i know, because ive been a coomer.
>>107918436>>107918450Just an fyi. If you want to pay for this stuff, try Vidthis AI. They have fairy laxed wan 2.6 models that let me do stuff grok never would. I don’t know if it’s completely uncensored, but if grok got your rocks off before, you should like wan 2.6 on vidthis ai.
Did you actually feel in charge there for a second, pedo? You'll be the first to be stoned, not the politicians, but you.
