Did you buy an OLED monitor?https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VZ-L0P8Gn2MThis guy said an OLED monitor is one of the ONLY upgrades you can make to improve gaming with most other stuff being a waste of money. They are better for movies and other stuff too. And the prices are coming down. And burn in is a thing of the past on the latest panels and come with 3 years warranty. VA, IPS, TN, MiniLED they are all worse in a lot of ways especially when it comes to the main purpose of a monitor - what things actually look like. So is it time? Make the OLED jump? You can get one for just $400 now.
not needed.
>>107982613yeah once i could afford it I did. a lot of people will come in and whine about burn-in now but they're just poor and coping
My laptop, phone and TV are all OLED. I'll probably get an OLED monitor when I can buy one with a Thunderbolt 4 hub and KVM. IPS "black" is doing a good job for now.
I've been using the same monitor for over 10 years now and it just looks as good as ever so I see no reason to change. Also it has these concenient USB ports on the side and all the models I've looked at only have them on the back.
>>107982762IMHO Dell make the best work monitors, my old U2413 even had a card reader in addition to lots of USB ports and even a perfectly usable sound bar.
ill downgrade to OLED in a few decades when all my crts are dead
>>107982613>an OLED monitor is one of the ONLY upgrades you can make to improve gamingTN panel is THE competitive gayming choice thoughbeit
>>107983003because zowie sponsors them
>>107982999based
IPSissies lost
>>107982613I got a ROG OLED for ~500-ish and it looks worse than my ~550 ProArt IPS display, from gaming to movies. Only thing that looks maybe 2% better is night time static photographs.
>>107983161based on what?
OLED tv yesOLED pc monitor no. I’m not getting burn in. IPS all the way.
>>107983337IPS can get a burn in as well, just not as easy.Besides, who leaves their monitor tuned on idling for 8 hours a day.
>>1079826132026 and this guy is now realizing that all this brightly colored GAMERZ crap is just crap designed to fleece suckers out fo their moneyI mean better late than never but isn't it pretty damn late
>>107983363I don’t want to worry about my monitor idling
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vRk4eBn-yOI
>>107983156The last top tier CS2 tournament was sponsored by ASUS and they still send their TN monitors instead of OLED. Austin Major had Alienware as sponsor yet they send their "Fast" IPS monitor instead.Also response time is a fucking meme for competitive gayming. Motion clarity is the king. Call me again when they make a 24-25 inch OLED with BFI.
>>107983527I got an oled now + the old va monitorI have taskbar up only on the VA and black background + timer for screen to turn off after a period of inactivityBy the time it gets burn in I can buy another monitor and so on.
>>107982613i have an oled steam deck and so far no problems with it. i've read that most oled problems need to be caused intentionally by leaving a screen on forever at max brightness. if my oled screen gets fuck up, then i will decide i don't like oleds, but until it does, i like em a lot because they can display true blacks instead of backlit grays
>>107983686>i've read that most oled problems need to be caused intentionally by leaving a screen on forever at max brightness.Because anything below that is too dark.
>>107983701Max full white brightness of an OLED is comparable to many older LCDs and I never ran even a 250 nit screen at full brightnessIDK why anons are so content with searing their eyeballs.
Nah, still not going to use a screen with degradation issues as a PC monitor where there are going to be constant static UI elements. I don't feel like babying my PC, having screensavers, all-black wallpaper, no desktop icons, minimized taskbar, hidden HUD, etcYou can say I'm huffing copium all you want, I'm not doing it.
>>107983555wait which one is meant to be best in that image? The WOLED 720Hz? There are 720Hz OLEDs now? That has no ghostingOr is it the ULMB2 one? But that has ghosting Or is it the Pulsar one? But that's still blurry. Or wait, is it less blurry? I'm confused
Yeah, it's great. The TVs are still a bit too expensive for me considering I don't really use mine but for my monitor and phone, I'll never go back.
>>107983003>THE competitive gayming choicerefresh rate past a certain point is a complete meme. humans aren't capable of reaction time fast enough to utilize it.from 60>120>144>180 sure you'll see improvements, going from 244 to 380 to 500+ i doubt you'd see any improvement at all.
I have the portable 16inch oled from viewsonic and it's just gorgeous even at 'only' 1080p.
>>107983605grey blacks vs a fucking mirror
>>107982613I buyed last year and will buy one this year too. Will have 1 4k 27" oled monitor and 1 ultra wide 5k2k 39" oled. This will be fucking amazing!
>>107983756The ones with clearer text since it means they preserve details better, which means either ULMB or 720 OLED.But technically Pulsar would be the best since it preserves details well enough with less FPS.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SXwXGYhi8_I
I tried oled one time and there was this weird streaking pattern that was most apparent on medium grays. Looked like brushed aluminum on areas that should've been a solid color. Returned it the next day.OLED not even once
>>107983756>looks at a test that supposed to show image clarity >can't tell which is goodThis shows how meme that website is. Someone made shit up and all of the reddit and /g/ crossdressers fell for it.>THIS IMAGE LOOKS BAD, LOOK!Fucking idiots.
>>107982613>And burn in is a thing of the past on the latest panels thats just lies
>>107984135What he meant: if burn in is uniform (aka you play gaems or watch movies) you won't notice slow burn in because your eyes will adapt to it.
>>107984185The panel algorithm does things like ensure even wear on each pixel and overtime it ups the volts to counteract the overall degradation
I've read they are bad for office work in that text readability is worse than IPS. Is that true?
>>1079846214k oleds arent badthen the 2026 new versions with different sub pixels are better at 1440p
FUCKING QDEL WHENNOTHIGN AT CES THIS YEAR
>>107984621The subpixel arrangement on OLED panels can cause text and UI element fringing (weird purple/green edges on letters or buttons).(Subpixels are the individual red, green, and blue lights that make up the panel. A group of subpixels is combined to create a "pixel" to the human eye.)The arrangement used by OLED panels is usually designed for video/games rather than text, since that was traditionally where OLED panels excelled (better pixel response time and color reproduction). Subpixels have always existed, but technologies like TrueType on Windows only support a limited number of subpixel arrangements. Because the software is not designed to go out of its way to handle these subpixel arrangements, you get fringing.Some software (ex. macOS, very modern Windows applications) have entirely given up on handling subpixel arrangement, and just fall back to using grayscale to try and make text look "OK" (rather than "great"). So if you're prioritizing desktop usage (primarily text and GUI interaction), there's a trade-off choosing OLED.Recently some manufacturers are creating OLED panels that use a "normal" subpixel arrangement (ex. 2026 LG panels). These will greatly improve text clarity, but will still suffer from burn-in.don't forget to like and subscribe
>>107984691You again? It's never happening
>>107982613>Did you buy an OLED monitor?No, burn-in is still too severe and happens too quickly. I actually use my monitor for work as well, the thing would be raped in a year.>MiniLED they are all worse in a lot of ways Eh, you get haloing as a downside but durability and actual brightness as an upside.
>>107985007they probably got chewed out by big OLEDDarn, I was excited for QDEL too...!
>>107985037>durabilitydo you though?
>>107982613>And burn in is a thing of the past on the latest panelsSo they're no longer OLEDs? What do you think causes the burn-in lol?
>>107984388Except it is inevitable for OLED to degrade over time.I'm not against it, I changed my monitors and TV to OLED. But saying it's a thing of a past is disingenuous. It will be fixed once we switch from Organic LEDs.
>>107983605Now try it with the brightness not on 200 percent on the left one
>>107982613>Did you buy an OLED monitor?I'm still on ccfl lcd.
>>107983605browsing with the xg27aqdmg rn
>>107982613Yes I have a 4K 27" monitor. Color quality and contrast is so much better then anything else. One year of heavy daily use so far with zero burn in.
>>107982613yes, it's basically the difference between actually seeing the content in front of you 1:1 and viewing it behind a milky glazed windowhoweverrgb tandem oled panels with g-sync pulsar are coming, so you should wait
OLEDs are a scam. The definition of planned obsolescence
>>107982613I got an OLED ultrawide. I can't go back. I need more OLED on my screens.Picrel is a mod for a Switch Lite, and the difference is stark.
>>107982613I've used a LG C4 as a monitor since 2024 when it released.
>>107982613>gamingno use case>moviesusing my 65" oled TV in front of the couchThey are much worse for text, and that's what matters for computer monitors
>>107982613maybe
>>107982613Y e s Asus OLED with the glossy panel display, and I have no regrets.
>>107982999Why are you gay?
i love my qd oled
Literally the only arguments against OLED are>it's too expensive!>it will burn in! (it's too expensive 2.0)I'll just buy another one kek
>>107983555>CS2loldead game
>>107987884It's not even expensive when you consider how expensive high refresh/high resolution monitors used to beA 4k 120hz monitor used to be ~$2500 and that was before the fed devalued the dollar.4k 240hz OLED is ~$1200 in post covid monopoly money
>>107983605glossy monitors are fucking dogshit lmao
>>107988188>I can't control for ambient light in my room so I'm going to settle for an inferior viewing experience WOW you people are such losers
>>107988188I disagree, I find them crisp AF, depending on the lighting in your setup. Matte for high light rooms obviously
>>107988468>my room lol, ANYWAYS>needs to turn an area of a house into a cave to make a shit product usableXD
Just checkedMy CRT has 32800 hoursAnd still perfect tubeFlatscreen could never, not even lcd>>107988188Matte is for cucks.Even my LCD secondary screen is glossy and I only use it for YT lol
sars... please redeem the oled !do not google burn in sir kindly the issue is fixed
>>107982734how much of an improvement was it? and did you go from the same resolution to the same (i.e. I just want to know what the OLED itself did, not just better PPI or something like that)
I bought my OLED last year. The picture is great, but honestly if you're not looking at a LCD or even TN panel side-by-side, you'll quickly forget the difference. The biggest thing holding it back at this point is HDR support with different operating systems. Just do research on the OLED panel the monitor you want has, some have issues with gray banding.
>>107988468I'm not anon but I already don't get enough sunlight as it is>>107983744this. people insisting on calling it "burn-in" lets people think you can avoid it with good practices like traditional burn-in but it's closer to voltage-induced pixel degradation which is very different in that you'll 100% experience it provided you're one of those strange people who intend to enjoy the things that they bought for years before trashing themfrom the manufacturer's point of view, this is probably ideal because they can simultaneously make an excellent product in terms of performance and avoid creating a situation where you're too satisfied to buy another one within 3-5 years. I would bet the subtle degradation over time could even prime customers to be vowed by the next product because you forgot that your previous OLED display looked similarly good when you first got it, but this could just be me being high on noticium
>>107990528>sunlightis actually bad for your skinvampiremaxxing is law
>>107990528>vowedwowed>>107990543the infrareds should be worth the damage from UVs surely, unless you're incandescent bulb/firemaxxing at home or have one of those hipster IR panels
>>107985611>But saying it's a thing of a past is disingenuous.Is just bait.Many such threads.
oled owners just buy a new monitor after 5 years when they get burn in and warranty is expired?
>>107991549yes
>>107982613>burn in is a thing of the past on the latest panels and come with 3 years warrantythree years of guaranteed quality for a $1,100+ monitor is a fucking joke.
>>107991569Some car manufactures only give you 2 years
>>107982613>Did you buy an OLED monitor?Yes, this shit's awesome. I would get another but I am unemployed.
>>107982613I have a 2160p 144Hz LCD display. While it's alright for my purposes, I feel like it doesn't really do anything particularly well besides okay color depth, just an "all-rounder". An OLED would be nice for sure, but most still have blur/persistence issues, and modern displays that are negating this feature with things like Nvidia Pulsar or various BFI techniques don't fully compare to CRTs. Most also have color fringing issues, only recently negated by stuff like Asus' RGB stripe technology (and that'll add to the cost as a premium new product). It's just an expense that I feel like I am not comfortable making when I know it isn't quite 'there' for the things that matter to me most, even if I'm sure the upsides could still be a very cool upgrade. I personally would like to come across a decent CRT for free/couple bucks instead...at least with my present financial situation.
>>107987281Which is which?
>>107988488>needs to turn an area of a house into a cave to make a shit product usable
>>107991645The color fringing issue is Windows's fault though. Non-toy OSs let you use grayscale text rendering without jumping through hoops or giving up on other font optimization features.
OLED monitor:- needs to turn on auto hide taskbar- have to use true dark wallpaper to reduce pixel degradation- have to hide all desktop icons- needs a third party app for dynamic wallpapers- needs to turn on screen saver after 5 minutes of inactivity- needs to turn off monitor after 10 minutes of inactivity- needs to avoid direct sunlight and UV rays- have to watch in a dark room to enjoy content
>>107991593Astounding shit logic.A car even if has certain defects won't break down entirely (unless it is a cuck ev, and then you are at fault for buying it in the first place), as opposed to monitor going kaput or having burn ins thereby failing in the very work they are supposed to do, i.e, display stuff flawlessly.
>>107991866The above steps are only applicable if one is poor.
>>107991862I agree, but I do not intend to use Linux or any Unix-based OS at this time due to my personal software needs and current workflow, as well as specific hardware driver support. I am also aware of noticeable difficulties with HDR on Linux, and if I am getting an OLED display, I would like to be able to enjoy its capabilities to the fullest. It also still does not yet mimic CRT's motion clarity to the same degree.
>>107982613>just buy the e-waste monitor come on you NEED itNo way fag. I'd have bought a miniled by now if there was actual choice in the 32" 1440p category and not literally just a single chink VA released recently. Still none for OLED.
>>107991866Have you considered just not setting it to "brighter than the sun". OLEDs will basically last forever if set at a sensible brightness level rather than eye-melting.
>>107991866
>>107983605>camera
>>107983792completely and utterly wrongthis is why i beat you in game>reaction timeway to miss the point>244>380not refresh ratesyou don't even know what you're talking about
