>2026: I am forgotten.
They only wanted to rewrite a few political articles to Musk's POV. The rest of the encyclopedia is boring and Wikipedia has no issues in that space.
>>107986933It needs photos and graphics.
>"Unbiased">omits all scandals from Untermusk's article
>>107987161Wikipedia is hideous for anything political and historical.>>107986933Actually use it quite a bit, it's definitely better when it comes to bias.For scientific/technical stuff I have notebooklm loaded up with textbooks and papers.
>>107986933its pretty good, you can suggest articles, I've had like 4 articles accepted alreadyneeds some pictures but after that its going to be simply better than wikipedia
>>107986933
>>107986933>turns out to be biased
>>107988981Did anyone expect any different?
>>107988625>wikipedia is bad because it has viewpoints I disagree with>ai hallucinations are better because the bias is what I agree with>also I get my learning about important things from chatbotsHow is life, having an IQ below 70?
It will actually write new articles from whatever you suggest to it. Go try it.
>>107990782you lost
Exactly the kind of response I'd expect from someone clinically retarded enough to rely on chatbots for information.
>>107990782>because the average wiki writer is totally sane and unbiased this is the sort of faggot creating the majority of editshttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Nikolai_Kurbatov
>>107991674Doesn't seem too affect him negatively too much if the things stated here are true
>>107986933Takes time to cook. They just recently fixed some formatting. Its a small pet project for them that they will prob later evolve for their own AI's quick fact checking
>>107988981How is it biased? Show me example
>>107988281thisI'd use it then
>>107988281>>107992104https://grokipedia.com/page/4chanI think they finally started adding images and the side box
>The eminent British historian Sir Richard Evans produced three expert witness reports for the libel trial involving the Holocaust denier David Irving, studied for a doctorate under the supervision of Theodore Zeldin, succeeded David Cannadine as Regius professor of history at Cambridge (a post endowed by Henry VIII) and supervised theses on Bismarck’s social policy.>That was some of what you could learn from Grokipedia, the AI-powered encyclopedia launched last week by the world’s richest person, Elon Musk. The problem was, as Prof Evans discovered when he logged on to check his own entry, all these facts were false.imagine willingly using this thing
>>107987161>WikipedialolBritannica >>>
>>107988625>>107988796Is it actually good or just a copy paste version of wikipedia with the exception of a few articles that glorifies twitter and elon musk?
>>107992140Wow fucking finally.
>>107987161Can you tell which is the wokepedia and which is an actual encyclopedia?