>AI gives you an answer almost immediately but it's not replicable, often includes esoteric properties, AI withholds how to get there>Read a book or an article Initially takes longer but you can replicate steps AND solve the issue yourself As soon as you get into niche topics, learning from books is better.
learning web dev is useless now, the same for sysadmin ai can handle all the work they used to do
>>107990204in my experience the shatbot is just a search engineoftentimes i still have to solve the issuei never liked learning from books.in fact id say theyre a strictly inferior method of learning compared to reading code and playing around with minimal working examplesi always did tutos and went straight into manuals, never read a skill book in my life, excluding the shit i had to read in schoolnow instead of a tuto i use a shatbot to get my feet weton top of that i instinctually reject learning from skill books because it uses memory.and fuck min maxing into being a walking man page. i actually do value my ability to problem-solve
>>107990245ai nigger == opinion automatically retarded
>>107990245>ai as sysadminkeki am all for AI but let's not exageratethis sounds like self driving cars or maid robots, let me guess: two more weeks until they're usable reliable and dont crash?
>twitter thread of a brown twittThe absolute state of /g/roids
>>107990250t. never touched any unique problems fizz-buzz reinventer
>>107990263youre engaging eithera) a shartyposter who mentions ai because its the latest thing they troll withb) a marketingroid paid to shill ai on gc) an llm whose function is the same as aboved) a poster from reddit so profoundly buck broken by the advertisement he feels compelled to take part in the ad campaignjs.
>>107990275you fucked up the quote?as for unique problems thats where you want to start with a blank pageand if your head if full of standard operating prosneedures youre not getting there
For hard topics, nothing beats the complete narrative you can get from a competent author. The problem with those books is that they were quite often the slop for their time, just an API dump with some fancier reformatting, and some horrible toy project the author built around it. If it's a serious STEM topic, you should read textbooks and papers. For tech janitor crap, AI/youtube is fine. As with all things, once you learn the fundamentals you can jump to shortcuts to learinng things you need.
>>107990283you can't even fathom someone successfully using what is probably the most revolutionary tool we ever invented as humans after maybe the industrial revolution.All because what? It's the latest virtue signaling battle for you people? AI must be bad because white men use it? Don't worry though, you'll probably get your midwit reparations in the form of some sort of UBI eventually but otherwise, unfortunately for you, reality doesn't have to adhere to your copes.Adapt or perish
>>107990476i use these tools.you dont.
>>107990204>AI withholds how to get therecouldnt u just like ask it?
>>107990263Self driving by DeepMind already does like 10x less crashes per mile driven then human drivers do.>AI maidsComing this year, but you won’t be able to afford the bot.
>>107990990we already have robot maids>look inside>its actually indianskekaroo
>>107991108AI (Actually Indians)
>>107991129yeah, this meme wont be going out of fashion anytime soon...
>>107990204Those books were useless in the stackoverflow era as well.
>>107990204>As soon as you get into niche topics, learning from books is better.For now
>>107990259Apple is hiring because they suck at implementing AI
I could read an oreilly book on docker of ask chatgpt
