How long until AI image generation is made illegal?
ha. i just said how wierd it was they werent pushing how easy it is to gen sexy children as a means to regulate like last week.
but for men its ok?
>>107991956when they make porn illegal.
what does VITTU exactly mean by "creating" and "images" though
>>107991956hag opinion discarded
>>107991956>women and childrenand what about men, you misandry bitch
>>107991956
>>107991990cruel abuse, bro
>>107991956roasties are so angry, let them seethe forever while we will use local AI to generate cp
>>107991990kek
>>107991970gay
>>107991956They're using the "put them in a bikini" to ban Grok and X. Its not about AI, but about X being a platform that allows dissents of European and America elite to speak out against mass migration policies, the covid policies, the resurgence of the communist experiment, and mass surveillance and mass censorship of the state governments in power
>>107991956I'm not a pedo but imma start generating and sharing ai cp just because of this retarded bitch.
>>107991956Kek, AI keeps libtards mad.>b-but you shouldn't be able to give a slingshot bikini to photos of a 5yo girl!If you didn't want that to happen, you shouldn't let your kids be photographed in the first place.
>>107991956Do these fuckers now that AI is more than Grok? Like most stuff is done with local AIs?Do they want to take my PC away?
>>107992310>Do they want to take my PC away?Uh, yeah. What have it away? Can't let the plebs have freedom.
>>107992196bro broke under literally zero pressure
>>107991956And who exactly is being "abused" when I make these fake images?
>>107991956creating sexual images of women without consent is already illegal in most developed countries under what are usually called Revenge Porn laws.it is another example of legislating things which are already legislated.
>>107992173Nuking X would backfire trmendously. Another platform will rise to take its place and it won't be run by good goy Elon
>>107991956Never thought I'd live to read a sentence as utterly retarded as "creating fake images is abuse." Silly me, I thought the abuse was creating real images. But then again, we all know who creates those real images, and for some reason that we all know they get a free pass, so we're now supposed to accept that fake people who literally don't exist deserve more protection than actual abused people.
>>107991970encouraged even
>>107992521>Another platform will rise to take its placeThats the plan, the ONLY person that still resist is Musk, once X falls, they get their mass censorship back. You might get smaller scattered communities, which is a very good thing for the elites as that means people cannot organize and voice dissents in mass. The goal is always to suppress speech and reduce the scale. They explicitly want reddit,facebook, instagram, and others to take place because the owners of those support the current censorship regime
>>107992310I mean I doubt anyone cares as long as you don't share them. The absolute moron that is elmo had to show the world what he goons to, so we all get fucked at the end.
