>is that a successful person?? ahhh i'm going insane!to third worlders any kind of western employment and access to money looks like magical cheating scientology satanism CIA
>>108006350>magical cheating scientology satanism CIAyour bot is hallucinating again suhkdeep
there's no such thing as talent in engineering or formal sciences.
>>108006446>there's no such thing as talent in engineering or formal sciences.yes there is.
>>108006584define it
>>108006603delivering results
>>108006603An inborn elevated degree of competance in their respective field.
>>108006693Can also be extended to include the ease in which competence is acquired through education and training.
>>108006693You can't be born with programming competence.
>>108006711That's called intelligence. Physics, math, programming, these are rigorously logical fields.
>>108006213Being shameless. Something you can't emulate
>>108006730but you can be born with the capacity of acquiring more information in two hours of programming than 200 jeets in a 12 week Udemy "degree" combined. >>108006407everyone knows you were about to call him 'industry plant' like the ultimate midwit failure that you are
>>108006730Let me be more specific then, it's the inborn potential for an elevated degree of competence in their respective field.>>108006740>That's called intelligenceEvery single field you listed has examples of idiot savants. In fact, pretty much every single high performer in these fields tends to have competence explicitly limited to their own domain. Mathematicians make for absolute dogshit programmers, and vice versa.Personally, I find the distinction is purely semantic and conventional. Intelligence is but the plural of mental talent.>these are rigorously logical fields.That doesn't mean the actual work is done as a logical process. Only people who suck at their jobs think that way, and they think that way because they lack talent. It shows in their work. Even working with logic itself is subject to talent.If you think because eventually work in a field is subjected to mechanistic rigor that you can compete against talented individuals by mechanistic rational means, it's only because you're young and inexperienced enough that you still fetishize reason as you've been taught to.