[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/g/ - Technology


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: sata-sas[1].jpg (173 KB, 1816x1220)
173 KB
173 KB JPG
Used SAS storage used to be cheap because it fell in the perfect gulf of being no longer useful in the enterprise space but not so worn down that consumer applications couldn't make use of it so long as someone had an HBA.

But now even the used stuff feels prohibitively expensive (at least for larger capacities like 10TB).
>>
>>108006695
The times of cheap hardware are over.
>>
>>108007450
The thing is this is USED storage. They've been running for awhile now, long before prices went haywire.

I accept used storage as a risk but I pay accordingly, especially for such a consumer-unfriendly standard (and the stuff is generally healthly enough for light workloads, like what a consumer might want a hard disk for compared to enterprise-level 24/7 zero-downtime situations). That risk isn't worth it when to buy this now will cost well over double but it's not like brand new SAS storage is affordable either.
>>
>>108007555
I'd recommend buying factory recertified drives instead.
>>
>>108007585
plain non-refurbished used drives are perfectly fine (or at least were, when they were dirt cheap)



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.