Is the future of the free web P2P?
>>108008419The internet was supposed to be P2P too
>>108008419been looking up that shit for a while, but I haven't come across the most acclaimed feature: inter-platform compatible posts
The powers will be will just change targets to make it infeasible.
>>108008419What is this some kind of Kabbalah diagram?
in theiry yes in practice no pouncing your packets around strange nodes is a bad idea
>>108008419This is going to sound /x/ tier, but hear me out. Human development is not aware of itself. The future of everything is cultivating self-sufficiency.
>>108010445based. Thank you anon for bringing some /x/ flavored sanity to this board.
>>108010302The famous binary tree of life
>>108008419It should be, but normalfags won't adopt a platform with fewer than 1 million users. Mastodon, Lemmy, Peertube etc. are also too complicated for brainless people to install with, so that severely hurts their potential userbase too.Also if it ever did take off big tech would strangle it to death and/or have Big Fat Donald declare it illegal via executive order.
I've been struggling trying to install a bluesky pds on my casa os home server,
>>108008419pic is not what p2p is
>>108008419There’s no future for the free web
>>108008419Make an eepsite nigger.
>>108010445Retarded.Plato.Technae.You're so fucking retarded that the reason why you're retarded is ancient history fundamental to the study of philosophy and ideas.
>>108008419Think of the worst possible outcome and that's what niggercattle will settle for. That's the future.The ideal future (if we are to continue using the current infrastructure) would be Hyphanet, but glowie psyops would prevent widespread adoption.
>>108011384>>108011458/thread
>>108008419Not really, since very few people actually use all of those p2p networks and at the very best it will end up as a circlejerk for contrarian NEETs, so basically like most boards on 4chan but p2p.
>>108011458From what I can tell the issue isn't "elites" it is the cattle class as the elites aren't anything without dumbass zombie brain people. So what we need is mass genocide of cattle class then the elites will just be a bunch of pshychos is suits with no actual power and soul having humans with actual brains will be chill and can have a free internet.Am I wrong? Instead of genocide perhaps education but cattle can't learn.I think I'm wrong it sounds horrible.But everything seems to be fucked because it has to be catered towards brain-dead soulless zombie cattle.
>>108011574At this point I think it's just better to gatekeep and let niggercattle uninstall themselves. So long as darknets remain large enough to make effective observation/analysis impractical, we can still profit.It's sad, though. Sometimes I wonder how much better everything would be if everyone just jumped it and move operations to Hyphanet. Everything would immediately get faster, more reliable and even more secure.
>>108008419Yes, but none of that (((federated))) bullshit
>>108011574>>108011647Hyphanet still relies on TCP/IP. We something built atop GNUnet, or some other transport agnostic layer. We cannot keep relying on legacy pozzed protocols forever.
>>108013255https://reticulum.network/
>>108013271almost good enough, yes, now we're getting somewhere
>search online for "p2p social media">find manyverse>it's been dead for years -_-Why are goycattle like that? What is it that compells a slave to love chains with which it is bound?
>>108008419no because the jew can't monetize and control a federated web like they can centralized websites.
>>108010041I would definitely like an aggregation and mass posting sync for my X and mastodon. But I don't think X would open an api
>>108008419What problem will decentralized social media fix?Social media will always be a problem for the internet, being decentralized or not.
>>108008419That pic is federation not P2P.>>108009962It's still is but it's slowing becoming more centralised thanks to NAT and CGNAT.
>>108013271>https://reticulum.network/>>108013292yup, they find a dev to take it over?https://github.com/markqvist/Reticulum/discussions/1069gunna have to try to rns into the bedrock
>>108013411Mental programming.
>>108013255Idaially you'd have a wifi meshnet and something like hyphanet built on top of it, but realistically what are the chances of this going mainstream? which mind you we'd absolutely need. That's why I'm ok with something more practical utilizing standard ipv4/tcpip.
>>108008419sure but federation isn't the same thing>>108010302you'd be surprised
>>108008419>fediverseNot if it's that, because if I delete something I want at least the illusion it was deleted.The fediverse just says "fuck you", everything you post is shared to other servers that will never honor your request to delete your shit.
>>108019250it's kinda hilarious that back then when mastodon was getting popular, the complaints were "I don't want to to federate THAT" and "they are blocking my server".and now the issue (with Matrix) is leaking metadata and un-delete-able files.
>>108009962That's completely incorrect DNS is intrinsically hierarchical as is TCPIP networking. You are a technological illiterate.
>>108019549not him, but anyone can host a DNS server, right? that would be more true before certificates
>>108008419I never understood how for video streaming, p2p never took off>Assuming download is same as upload bandwidth, can scale locally and infinitely with zero cost to server>Pay for your watching with upload
