[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/g/ - Technology


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: desloppification.jpg (371 KB, 1920x1080)
371 KB
371 KB JPG
Why make a single ai juggle everything when you could split it into a team of polished bots who have access to the tools humans already use? When will we get to the point when ai is being trained on the process of creating rather than the final product? Because when your “polymath” “renaissance man” models try to make a Pixar movie from the ground up within the bot’s blackbox headspace it always looks like shit. Why not have:
>a bot for writing the script
>a bot producing the voice lines in Ableton
>bot sculpting and rigging the models in Blender
>bot animating within pixar’s state-of-the-art animation software
>a bot editing the final cut in Avid
For all we know Disney has already overhauled their systems to record and analyze the keystrokes of every artist on staff so that they can train a model to “animate buzz’s movements the same way our animator Steve would do it, with a little bit of Joe’s style sprinkled in”
>>
>>108009675
Loss of finer grained context between models, any other questions?



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.