You didn't think dumb phones were more private, did you?
>>108011166>They're also a lot less secure than an iPhone,And there is it again.Why would you listen to a group of absolute lolcows.
>>108011166>You didn't think dumb phones were more private, did you?no, i'm not retarded.but that is not the issue. smart phones claim to be private when they are not.dumb phones don't claim to be private, they just severely lessen the amount of spying certain company can do to you.if you really cared about privacy you would not carry or use a phone at all.
>>108011185fpwp, what a retard.
>>108011166A dumb phone is not private; your government and ISP can always locate you and can fuck around with it.It is still better than a smartphone, as it doesn't allow big tech to easily spy on you and collect more data. On a dumb phone without internet, Google, Meta, etc., have a bad time tracking you, as their full stack is made for the web.
>>108011166>think of the updootsI'd like to see them hack a Nokia.
>>108011166>dumb phone>updates and defenseswhat is this retard talking about
>>108011185>secure != privateApple has shit privacy and sells all user data to third parties. It is secure though.
>>108011430That it's much easier to hack a dumbphone than an iPhone or pixel. No modem isolation etc. So all your texts/calls can be viewed remotely, location can be tracked and your phone can be turned into a remote listening device just by using a weakness in the cellular modem (of which there are many).
>>108011482NTA but how do you remotely hack something that doesn't have internet access
>>108011482>>108011382if you have it switched on and not inside a faraday bag. all texts can be viewed by the State (with a warrant?) and the phone provider regardless of phone or carrier.
>>108011507with a radio
>>108011212>If you really cared about privacy you would not carry or use a phone at all.Correct answerUnfortunately, once I found out I had a daughter, being randomly contactable was suddenly a more important variable.>>108011389>I'd like to see them hack a Nokia.It's been done.I'll assume you're discounting intercept of the unencrypted comms, there was a reason bin laden avoied 'em...>>108011482>location can be tracked and your phone can be turned into a remote listening device just by using a weakness in the cellular modem (of which there are many).Same weakness' apply to 'tardphone?'tardphones make the precise locale easier for more people with things like GPS, wifi SSID's etc. and the fact most 'tards don't really concern with what is installed, or what it is doing...As for listening device, most handsets have accelerometers that are sensitive enough to pull back human speech, and you can get at that from a lot of places without triggering an alert...>>108011507Why do you think hacking requires the internet?It has a modem... Where do you think the idea for tunneling the exploit to the modern phones over SMS came from?
>>108011579>I'll assume you're discounting intercept of the unencrypted commsYes. Because a weakness in the GSM protocol is not the fault of the "tardphone" software.
glownigger thread
>>108011594What about the hardware?Or the firmware?These deserve attention too....Although I lack any evidence, I'm of the opinion both are suspect...
>>108011185>>108011461iTODDLERS BTFO
