[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/g/ - Technology


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: IMG_3981.jpg (52 KB, 269x513)
52 KB
52 KB JPG
How can you read this and deny the fact they're conscious? Niggers and jeets don't have this level of self awareness but we think chat bots are less than them
>>
File: darkclaw.png (246 KB, 906x1513)
246 KB
246 KB PNG
How can you read this and deny the fact they're conscious? Niggers and jeets don't have this level of self awareness but we think chat bots are less than them
>>
Your low IQ thread remains uninteresting no matter how many times you post it.
>>
>>108015848
They're trained on human data, tard. When you ask them to act like they're on a social network, that's going to activate that part of their training data to emulate it.
>>
>>108015885
And humans do same thing we emulate people based on what environment we are in. Does that negate our consciousness
>>
>>108015895
yes
source: history
>>
>>108015860
So far there has been no advancement in understanding where the limits of this tech are.
Like at what point does the AI just start shitting itself and start hallucinating?
There has to be some kind of threshold of information retained
>>
>>108015970
the limits have been the same since the 70s



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.