[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/g/ - Technology


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


Stack overflow surveys seem to indicate Elixir is the most envied language. I assume this is because of its functional nature. After some research, it seems Elixir runs on the Erlang VM. To me, running as bytecode on a VM seems like an obvious flaw holding the language back. What's odd is that Elixir devs seem to worship the "BEAM".

What would you think about a true compiler for Elixir? To take the world's most envied language and improve it by making it run as a native linux binary.

Am I missing something? It seems like the obvious next step, but the Elixir community seems to be a cult that's convinced themselves it's a good thing their language runs in a VM.
>>
>>108018609
I kinda like Elixir but it's slow as shit.
>>
Yeah it seems like it would be. I would think if it were truly compiled it would be much faster. Might also see smaller file sizes for release builds and less memory usage.
>>
If it gets a compiler, it will just be yet another GCC/LLVM frontend, which is fucking lame. I don't care if it's astronoically more effort, I don't want everything to be the same 5 software, period. It's not just because it's lame, which is the most important reason, frankly, but also because it's bad for a software ecosystem if nobody makes something from scratch.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.