Is there any AI that's better than Grok for image editing?
>>108021227If you want open source model, there's quite a few, but that requires your GPU vram be free and you setup shit. I think Grok video and image editing got a nice update just yesterday that pushed them to the top of the chart in text to image, text to video, image to video. And they're fairly uncensored, compared to Google banana
>>108021227Local, as ever, for anything, you chud.
>>108021466Is there actually a local model that can do it better than Grok? Do you have any proof?
>>108021354does grok still does the default image to video instead of image to image?
>>108021466I have a rtx 4070 (12GB VRAM)am i doomed to potato quality?
>>108022099grok.com/imagine
>>10802222412GB is enough for decent image quality and editing. The big part you're probably gonna miss is the image -> video. Self created video is probably might be doable with bit of quantization. So you'd want to use those capabilities since you have it.
>>108021466Want to get into this, what to use for local?
>>108021227Gemini is still better for some kinds of modifications, like uploading two images and merging them. I mean, you upload two photos of different persons and ask Gemini to create an image of those people together: Gemini does it almost perfectly, Grok doesnt even try
>>108022099Unfortunately yes.
>>108022415That's interesting. Most of the work I do is just changing the quality of a single existing image, not doing something creative with multiple, but I'll keep Gemiini in mind if I've ever got a task like that.
>>108022401comfy ui, flux2 klein>>108022527local is best for changing quality since you can prompt at higher resolution, it's worth giving a shot if you have 16GB VRM or more
