I will change to a smaller, local internet service provider, which is faster and costs less. But they offer only IPv4-NAT and IPv6. That means I don't get my own IPv4 address. Instead it's shared with other customers.4chan still forces IPv4. If you're behind a NAT, a single user in the NAT can get the whole NAT network banned, because all users have the same public IPv4. Does that mean I effectively have to stop using 4chan?When the fuck will 4chan change to IPv6?
>>108057894>Does that mean I effectively have to stop using 4chan?Yes.>When the fuck will 4chan change to IPv6?Never.
>>108057894My isp doesn't offer any form of ipv6 connectivity at all.
>>108057894>Does that mean I effectively have to stop using 4chan?Yes.If you have a dynamic IPv4, you cannot use 4chan or any other website or forum.
>>108057927That's strange. There's a heavy push towards IPv6, because IPV4 addresses became scarce and, as a consequence, very expensive.
>>108057976doesn't matter if they just jam everyone into a massive NATthat being said I very rarely find myself banned from 4chan due to someone else's post, so I guess no 4chan users in my area
>>108057955Did you mean IPv6? With IPv6 you can indeed not use 4chan, because 4chan is literally unreachable via IPv6. Other major websites have no problems with IPv6, although smaller sites and services may be IPv4 only too.
4chan devs are baby ducks. They can't even support webp 15 years later. They were exposed as using eol bsd.
>>108057894I am also on DS-lite with an IPv4 address shared by other customers of the ISP and a unique IPv6 subnet.I seem to remember that 4chan was planning to upgrade their software and allow IPv6 connections almost a decade ago but ever since moot sold it nothing has happened with those plans and we can assume they're abandoned, if they ever existed.I have eaten some bans meant for other people before but it hasn't been a major issue so far.I think it's weird how 4chan prefers to give out temporary IPv4 bans instead of banning permanent IPv6 subnets though.You can easily circumvent the former while the latter is impossible to get out of.But rewriting the software this site is running on doesn't make any money, I guess.
My friend, I'm basically rate banned from GitHub because of that shit. To be fair, I think if I log in I'll get some slack, but logged out I'm simply banned kekI fucking hate the online monkeys of this country
>>108058765>instead of banning permanent IPv6 subnets though.My current ISP gives out IPv6 prefixes that change with every router reset.
>>108058784Interesting, mine doesn't. I have had the same prefix for 10 years now, I think.
>>108058827Basically a static IP. I remember how long ago anyone would have loved having a static IP, but now it seems like a curse.
can somebody explain to me how (((that guy))) gets so many spare ips
>>108057894What speeds do you get now and what will you get with the new ISP?How much will you save?Personally a CGNAT'd connection doesn't really register to me as a "real" internet connection and isn't something I'd want to pay for unless my only alternative was horrendously slow (like <40Mbit DSL).
>>108058460
>>108059007Up to a 50 fold speed increase for almost just half the cost.
>>108059090>50 fold speed increaseIf this means 10 -> 500 Mbit then I'd go for it.If it means 200 -> 10,000 then I probably wouldn't.
