Post yfw the AI bubble bursts
>>108105182
>>108105182most of /g/ being so clueless on ai proves how low iq even this board isthe 'ai bubble' doesnt exist, at best, you have some small number of companies that some retarded shareholders overinvested in that have no product at all and are a wrapper for chatgpt that will go down under. otherwise there will be no bubble pop for the tech itself at all, it's all here forever.
>>108105312>retarded shareholders overinvested in that have no product at all and are a wrapper for chatgpt that will go down under.that's what a bubble pop is, tulips didn't vanish from existence when that bubble popped either
The "AI bubble bursting" will be like the dotcom bubble bursting in the early 2000s: there will be a temporary sharp downturn in the market, lots of the stupidest players in the field will go bankrupt, but the underlying technology will be there to stay and its effect on society will only grow even more after the initial bubble. If the dotcom bubble bursting didn't kill the internet, the AI bubble bursting won't kill AI.
>AI bubble burstsIt's still funny to me that normies managed to convince themselves there's going to be some magical event after which a technology will cease to exist. All the software and hardware will just suddenly poof. Kind of like an age of Aquarius for people born too late to experience being hippies.
>>108105395>that's what a bubble pop is, tulips didn't vanish from existence when that bubble popped eitherthey did get nuked out of existence in their supply, and people do see the "bubble pop" of ai as something that will make them return to the previous world without it, but in reality it literally wont have any effect at all on anyone's every day life.
>>108105400The internet is still nowhere near what 90s hype promised. Grifters were talking it up like tron was going to be real by 2005 at the latest.
>>108105445>but in reality it literally wont have any effect at all on anyone's every day life.everyone 401k is gonna take a pretty huuge hit
>>108105182rare case where one can lose a lot of money but I like it
>>108105312wow you have described a bubble as it happened for e.g. rails, telco, internet.they all have survivors who become robber barons
>>108105766no because the company that actually develops agi to pop the 'bubble' will create more value than the few thousands wrapper companies that will go under will lose
>>108105182/biz/niggers where you at?
>>108105312The internet isn't a bubble, but the dotcom situation absolutely is a bubble.
>>108105830> will create more value How?
>>108107725>how will a digital worker same or better for most things than a human that can be duplicated infinitely and wont ever complain add more value in an increasingly digital world?
>>108105182>he thinks there is an AI bubble
>>108105830>he thinks LLMs can somehow become agibaka
>>108105830>the company that actually develops agiInsane that you call everyone else low iq while believing in agi
>>108105182Think of the consequences anon, when the bubble will burst, then it is guaranteed that as a response the US government will bail out big tech.This means that they will keep doing what they were doing before the burst AND enjoy your tax dollars.Why would the government bail them out? Because they are the main resources to spy on and control everyone.Heads will not roll, companies will not fail, (You) will get poorer anyway.
>>108109918>>108109948>the thing that can continually learn more patterns from reality will NEVER EVER become fully indistinguishable from a human despite it already being 95%+ the way there for most humanity while being so new and running on non-asic hardware
>>108105182The comedy is that the mess has gotten so incestuous and tangled by their bullshit that there is no easy unmeshing when it all collapses. They're going to drag everything and everyone down with them.So yeah, basically >>108105206
>>108110578A chatbot can not become "agi" in a way that makes any difference
>tfw picking up a 80GB H100 for a couple of hundred bux
>>108110797you are a "chatbot", and a much dumber and slower one in more ways than not.
>>108107263Internet was a bubble too, lots of optical fiber was laid which had nothing connected to it. Yes, eventually the Internet grew but it was not within the time frame required for the level of investment to make sense. There was massive over investment.
>>108110996>t. seething ai cultist
>>108111725>i cant respond so ill project that my opponent is madthanks for showcasing so well that you're lower iq than a 3b llm, concession accepted.
