>and 52 coresIs Intel back?
>700wwe're going beyond housefires.
>>108110907AMD has 725w cpus
Ugh *groan*... this is not end users, sweatie.
>>108111146the highest end Threadripper when running at 5GHz uses 1300 watts.
>>108111173>Threadripper when running at 5GHzI'm not up to date with current CPU specs but surely it can't go 5 GHz on all cores out of the box?
>>108110833Does it need RAM?
>>108111230Xeon Max was a one off due to a supercomputer deal.
>>108110833More like supernova.
>>108111184Correct, the CPU is power limited to around 350 watts, if you want all cores to boost to 5 GHz you need the 1000+ Watts, but you know, 96 cores at 5 GHz requires a lot of power
>>10811083352 cores is not enoughi need 1000 E-cores so i can compile linux in 10 seconds
>>108110833the fuck do I want with 52 cores?I'm not running llama for my whole street.
>>108111173Crazy how that's less than 14 watts per core.>>108111771If you can't think of a use case you probably don't need that many cores and should stick with consumer grade chips instead of spending money needlessly.
Blender simulations use the cpu, so, would this be for me?
>>108110833>Is Intel back?yes, intel is back to mid 2019 to compete with the 64 core epyc.
Good morning saar, AMD can not be dethroned. Give up. You can't compete.
>>108110833700W!? wtf even my threadripper pulls only 200W
>>108110833It will be able to run quake at 40fps 800x600.
>>108112184>my threadripper pulls only 200Wa modern AMD threadripper can easily pull more than 200W if it was allowed to go full throttle on all cores.Also the idea that these are "Desktop" chips is funny. No way in hell is Intel going to release a 52c chip for the desktop market. It'll be reclassed back in some workstation market and cost will match the retards who buy it.
>>108110833>52 cores>16 real cores and 36 e-cuck cores
>>108110833
>>108110833at some point im gonna need a server grade ups to run a fucking gaming desktop jfc
