>Version goes backwards.>Python 3.6 was released before the version 3.15Any common sorting software, will place 3.6 as a higher number than 3.15Because it is read as 3.6060 > 15Lmao.Nobody was smart enough to future proof and released as version 3.06So they could release 99 versions without any problem.
I 3.60 no scope your mom nerd
>>108112324every single version number is like this and nobody "future proofs" as you suggesta bad chart isn't a versioning problem. Version sorting is annoying due to all the -dev and -alpha and other inconsistent tags, not the numbers.
natural sorting
Bait or legit retard?
When I see python I do a 3.60 and walk away.
>>108112324Im kind of retarded but why couldnt they make the version number just go up? Why couldnt it just by Python 3.7? or Python 4? why not 3.61? There is no real limit to how precise or broad the number needs to be, right?
>>108112324>Python 3.6 was released before the version 3.15What?
3.6 is 3.6.0 and a string not a number
>>108112605I think he means some python code breaks because it needs "version >= 3.6".Which worked until 3.10 was released which is alphabetically before 3.6 so it thinks you're running some ancient version.
>>108112605Yes? Because 6<15
>>108112492>Bait or legit retard?Hmmm
