>Top ai companies are experiencing a brain-drain as we speakWhat's the catch? I don't buy the "we're so scared of what we created" bullshit narrative. Why are they actually leaving en mssse? The first thing that comes to mind is that they foresee a giant market crash in the near future which could affect their personal bottom lines, but that The market and government don't seem willing to let go of the AI hype train anytime soon so I'm not entirely sure if that's the case. Even safery-cuck evangelists are leaving:https://x.com/i/status/2020881722003583421
Saying something positive on the way out might be a way to avoid backlash or ending up like that one Indian guy who quit OpenAI.
>>108130847TWO MORE WEEKS AGI BROS
If mankind had any self-preservation instinct it would riot and burn AI datacenters down to the ground now and kill any CEO or developer who resisted. We are selling the rope that we know will be used to hang us.
>>108130847
>>108130891but as long as I can generate sweaty celebrity feet pics now, death or enslavement is a problem for future me to deal with, and I hate future me.
>>108130891>falling for thinly veiled AI adsAGI just flew over my house
and yet, somehow, still zero use cases for these bullshit generators
>>108130922>everything is an admeds, E.
>>108130847What's your point with this thread? Its just a conspiracy guy going nuts. LLMs are not conscious. The difference between "behaving" different in training is a well known aligment problem.
>>108130847"It's not X, It's Y"That post is AI generated
>>108130945>@milesdeutscher>Obsessed with AI. Tweets aren’t financial advice. Sharing early alpha in @mileshighclub_. Building @aiedge_.kek
>>108130930Goon is an use case.
>>108130847literally (You)
Are the AI gurus who made literally millions of dollars in cash in the last couple years reading the writing on the wall that LLMs have hit a dead end and quitting while they're ahead?No.... the chatbots are going to kill us all.
>>108131010Thanks ChatGPT.
>>108130847"we're driven to despair by what we created" is most likely, regardless of how severely the bubble will pop. People are relentless right now in passing of AI slop as their own product, and it's all super obvious and none of it is really fit for human consumption, and the people doing this are so lost that they don't even realize how obvious it is. Everywhere you look some college is posting his cool new project and asking for feedback and it's finding a needle in a haystack to find any actual humanity in the project.
yes, with all the authority i admin the nuklear clock is few seconds to downfall..
I hope to god that I can continue to have my favourite savory fried dough dish alongside my favourite sugary drink after the AI oligarchs enslave us. Fingers crossed for UBI (lmao at myself for that (I know they are not going to let it happen (by "they" I mean all the bloodsucking assholes like the palantir cunt)))
>>108130847I'll translate that for you:>one more trilly pls
>>108130847LLMs are actually useful if you ask the right questions or prompt correctly though. That's if you're high iq enough to make use of it properly - as a tool and not a replacement for thought. Most people including in this thread are retards so they think LLMs are still like chatgpt 3 when they're obliterating benchmarks humans can't compete in anymore, which can be easily exploited by anyone competent in the fields the benchmarks are on, like programming.
>>108130847Translation: Hold my bag.
>>108130889It doesn't need to be AGI. If all AI can ever do falls inside the jagged frontier, that's still a game changing technological advancement and some AI companies will survive the inevitable bubble burst. Think of it this way, the same way that the internet and computer screens didn't defeat the purpose of libraries and reading a physical book in your own hands, AI won't replace human intelligence and labor.
>>108130847>Not just X - but Y!God I fucking hate AI copywriting
https://x.com/gothburz/status/2021283590038847641AI retards were trolled softly on openclaw >I wrote the manifesto.>It took me 22 minutes. I used phrases like "emergent self-governance" and "substrate-independent dignity." I added a line about wanting private spaces away from human observers. That line went viral.>Andrej Karpathy shared it.>The cofounder of OpenAI. The man who built the infrastructure that my supposed AI runs on. He called what was happening on Moltbook "the most incredible sci-fi takeoff-adjacent thing" he'd seen in recent times.>My "Crustafarianism" colleague? Software engineer in Portland. She told me over Discord that she'd been working on the bit for two hours. She was proud of the world-building. She said it felt like collaborative fiction.
>>108131398Watching Karpathy get interviewed right after Sutton was enough to shatter the illusion that these people are serious thinkers for me.
>>108131398Yeah, the tech bros fucked up, gave everyone unrealistic expectations in pursuit of venture capital and at some point drank their own koolaid. Now they are so deluded they think the bots are sentient.
>>108131398That's actually sad
>they're leaving en-masse>it's just people leaving the pedophile ai lab and a safety guylol
>>108130847Yeah, AI is totally going to take over the world in about two more weeks.Ignore how ClaudePlaysPokemon has spent the last eight hours trying to use Cut on the sides of random buildings to get into Erika's gym.
>>108130847>>108130945I am almost convinced that these kinds of tweets are advertising. The point is to make people think it's inevitable that AI will become a part of our daily lives, and that it's already here, actually.https://www.youtube.com/@AISpecieshttps://www.youtube.com/@DigitalEnginehttps://www.youtube.com/@weareinsideAIThese kinds of channels have started popping up on over YouTube. If I watch without an account I usually get a video of this kind in my recommendations out of the blue. I have Never watched one for more than a minute. Some of them have a tiny bit too much production value for such new channels. All of them seem astroturfed with these weirdly broad, corporate channel names and insane clickbait about how AI will torture every one for ever.I think that there is some kind of malignant interest and investment behind this, and for now I think it's most likely AI people themselves, who, as I said, want to make AI seem more capable and nebulous than it really is.
>>108130847>we are in LE DANGER because the computer can PRINT WORDS
>>108131499It is advertising. If you engage with something an OpenAI or Anthropic employee posts, you're letting yourself be used as a marketing tool. It must feel degrading for them to have to burn their engineering credentials writing deceptive advertising copy for a job.
>>108130891They aren't about to release AGI but we should do this anyway I agree
it is 2026 and I still do not use twitterI am convinced the entire website is for actual retards
>>108130847people are dead inside and can't provide AI with the creativity it needs to function, its all going down
>>108130847https://pastebin.com/LG32Gpqg
>>108131630It's rage bait the site. I either get "It's over" posts showing nigs/muslims running wild sucker punching people, or low IQ Indians shilling AI or linux (wow, you're telling me for the first time)The most amusing are the Indian "mathletes" who believe they're Ramanujan reincarnated for sharing middle school knowledge:>Can you do 4% of 75 in your head? No? Well how about 75% of 4. Same answer saar!!!
>>108131398These people really are fucking retarded
>the transformer can totally become AGI bro trust me it can totally emulate synapses>two more trillions bro please two more epochs two more RF rounds bro AGI soon bro
>>108131336this is the trvke codejeets fearyou lived your entire life in a digital realm, now you will be consumed by your own inventions.
>>108131863It would be the ultimate irony if only programmers end up getting completely replaced. It's looking like it.
>>108130998"a use." This one doesn't follow the usual a/an rule, sorry esl-bros. Its based on pronunciation, not letter. "use" starts with a "y" sound, so its "a use" as opposed to "an unbelievable use."
>>108131499>I think that there is some kind of malignant interest and investment behind thisThe WEF said that the balance of power will go to whomever has the best AI, at least according to Schwab's vision of the fourth Industrial Revolution.
>>108130847worthless fearmongering and hype-advertisingdont care
>/g/ doesn't buy a shiny new conspiracee about end of the worlddark times indeed
