>literally 0 usable open source alternativesWhen will troonix nerds stop arguing about dumb shit nobody cares about like window managers and make software for industries that actually matter?
>>108178019I Just use a better and cheaper provider like BricsCAD.
>>108178019FreeCAD works perfectly fine, I do agree that about the Window managers though
When you pay them to, fag.
>>108178019Duh. Just as an unwhite can't build or maintain a white society, a NEET in a basement somewhere can't build or maintain professional software.The only reason Linux is even vaguely usable as an embedded platform - and no other task - is because multi-billion dollar companies wrote 90% of the code.If you can fool one of those megacorps into making a good CAD program, you're laughing - but so far, none of them have even bothered to make a GUI (servers, ISP-supplied modems and IoT lightbulbs don't need them).
>>108178169>multi-billion dollar companiesA company is an abstract entity, they don't write code. You need to have some sort of neural capacity for that.
>>108178169msft market cap is like 3 trillion and it cant even ship updates without bricking computers
>>108178019> maintain professional softwareLMFAPOOSuch as Windows, right? Broken shitware which has been poorly assembled by retards at MS led by a gooning jeet. 99,9 % of code is poorly written slopware, whether from Mega Corps or NEETs
Pretty sure solidworks works with proton
>>108178169fpbp and pic related.
>>108178169>vaguely usable as an embedded platform - and no other taskSkill issue.
>>108178491not the first post retard
>>108178019says a lot that these threads are using more and more niche software to make their stupid point. i've never heard of any of these boomerware programs
>>108180817But which post is it, brainlet?
>>108178019>dumb shit nobody cares about like window managersSomeone must care, for there to be so much contraversy? But I do agree with the premise: Wasted energy>make software for industries that actually matter?You posted a list of private companies products?Why is is on "linux" to build autocad? Can't autocad do that? Just think. If they didn't go out of their way to entrench themselves so heavily into a single marketspace then they could literally just run the compiler with different flags and output *nix binaries...
>>108180817We've called you "freetards" for the better part of a half-century for many, MANY reasons.This is but one of them.
>>108185305Mad?
>>108185328I'd be pretty embarrassed to admit I can't count past three. You appear to lack such cognitive functions, however.We didn't have problems like this until we let the third-world onto our Internet. I think we need to revise that choice.
>>108185597Yep, still mad.
>>108181150>niche boomerware>acadits going to be hilarious in the near future when the shit stops going down the hole in former 1st world colonies
>>108181150That's the programs they used to make the building you live in and all the infrastructure that supports it.
>>108181150That's because you never have, and never will, do anything except cost taxpayers money.
