Which OS is better for privacy and security?
None of them.
>>108181190ChromIUM OS Flex has the best OOB security settings.
>>108181190OpenBSD OS
>>108181190I would trust my own administration of Linux before I would trust anything by Apple, Google or Microsoft
>>108181190Linux, security through obscurity and actual security features.
>>108181190Linux and BSDs can be as secure (or insecure) and private, as you want it. The other twos are backdoored corposlops.
>>108181190Pufferfish wit dat big ass lip
>>108181190>privacyLearn to configure firewalls.>securityLearn operating system hardening.Both Windows and Linux are used in restricted enterprise environments, and both can be equally private and equally secure. macOS/iOS with custom profiles and MDM is equally strong for enterprise use on workers' laptops.Out of the box without any hardening - all 3 are equally weak with regards to privacy and security.
>how do i consume corposlop without consuming corposlopTell me you aren't asking this
Bump
>>108181190Linux > Apple > Microsoft simple as
Can't be hacked if there is no internet connection
>>108181190Nothing made in the last 10 years or anything connected to an internet gateway
>>108181190Install gentoo
>>108184409you don't have a cluelinux has a vast number of expolits checked in by every major state, apple is rooted by...apple.
>>108185334what the fuck is this horse shit grifters
>>108183046The only correct answer ITT.
>>108181190OpenBSD.Consider also Hypervisors.If you just use the normie 3, then linux obviously.
>>108186705*consider microkernels.
>>108181190Privacy? Linux.Security? MacOS.Both? GrapheneOS.
>>108181190No one, privacy in tech is not real
>>108187776>pozzreadySays it all, really.
>>108183046>Out of the box without any hardening - all 3 are equally weak with regards to privacysomething open will obviously be better for privacy than the proprietary slop out of the box.
>>108185814
>>108185814>you don't have a clueand you don't have any common sense
Install Gentoo.
Objectively, OpenBSDRealistically, LinuxGlowingly, QubesRetardedly, give it back jamal
>>108181190none of them anon, if you want privacy and security you send messages through a paper and then the one who get the messages burn them after reading
>>108181213the little art pieces and songs they make for each release are too much sovli never see any mention of it in here for whatever reason
