[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/g/ - Technology


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 11322129965.jpg (64 KB, 743x635)
64 KB
64 KB JPG
you know AI robotics is imminent, right?

manually programming robotics was a wrong path that robotics went down for decades. It turns out, robotics is a closed problem. There is a definite point of failure or success that can be measured on sensors, and that will be the basis for AI training. Robotics will very soon get automous motion down to a perfection. In a very short amount of time, an autonomous robot can have 1,000 years of motion training.

in the next few years, you will see fully autonomous robots. in the next five years, they will be everywhere.
>>
Teleoperated seems like a first step to me. Blue collar jobs could be turned into white collar jobs (VR teleoperated robot labour) which could be performed from anywhere on earth 24/7 in rotating part time shifts.
>>
>>108191393
>Blue collar jobs could be turned into white collar jobs (VR teleoperated robot labour) which could be performed from anywhere on earth 24/7
Sure thing bro
We'll do this from Pune and Hyderabad
>>
>>108191428
Yes filipinos are already teleoperating waymos in California.
>>
>>108191356
"Organic" grown robot behavior is probably the way to go, but it will be weird.
We've seen how horny robots can be.
>>
>>108191393
>>108191443
Was about to say, this is already a thing in excavation and dredging.
>>
>>108191428
You already have literal surgeries where this is being done with the Da Vinci robotic system.
>>
We've been doing this* for a decade already you have absolutely no idea what you're talking about
>>
>>108191393
Teleoperated robots really make too much sense as a buniness for it to not happen unless the government steps in.
Why pay immigrants American wages to do labour like cleaning and construction when you could pay a person in south east asia to teleoperate a robot?
The internet is globalizing white collar work and teleoperated robots will globalize blue collar work.
>>
File: 1771216810266.jpg (86 KB, 760x425)
86 KB
86 KB JPG
>>
File: robot bank teller.jpg (89 KB, 601x578)
89 KB
89 KB JPG
>>
>>108192256
>Race to the bottom
If you eliminate enough jobs and put downward pressure on wages and upward pressure on demand for domestic jobs you're shooting yourself in the foot over short term gains, you need people to be able to afford your products and services domestically or you can't offer products and services domestically
>>
>>108192256
Also, teleoperated robots will be the future of infantry soldiers as well since 1st world nations were already incapable of getting their population to join the army in any large numbers anymore even before the current drone meta.
>>
>>108192297
>you need people to be able to afford your products and services domestically or you can't offer products and services domestically
Nah all you need is a very small ammount of people with a shit ton of money making big moves while the rest live paycheck to paycheck or off gibs.
The social contract exists because regular people are still able to kill the elites if they really try (in theory), not because they are needed for the economy beyond supplying labor.
Once the elites harness enough technology to become essentially demigods, they will be able to destroy the social contract without consequences and become the economy.
In any case, if it makes money, companies will try it regardless of how bad for society it might be.
>>
>>108191356
Imminent? More like immanent!
>>
>>108192297
>>108192297
nah

the vast majority of people dont need to be able to afford anythin to have a booming economy

in america, the top 10% of consumers do almost 50% of total consumer spending. sll they need too do is doble consumer spending of the top 10% and wipe 90% of people out from even being able to participae in the economy at all. I literally mean 90% of people not being able to afford shit like a bottle of water

the economy would be booming. thats jst doubling top 10% spending. if they 5x it, growth would be parabolic. companies would be brining in 4x revenues compared to what they do now

i don't think you really understand. when human labour isn't needed they really dont need many people participating in the economy
>>
>>108192800
>human labour isn't needed
Only when you get machines hiring machines to make stuff to be sold to other machines.
This might be happening already.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.