[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/g/ - Technology


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: Lawyer.jpg (258 KB, 1080x1075)
258 KB
258 KB JPG
It is mofre dangerous to notify a company about a vulnerabilityc than just blackmailing them for money.
Because if they have vulnerability word can get out and they lose millions through lost revenu e, while with hackers they can settle in secrket.
>>
extortion is still extortion even if you announce it publically on your gay little blog
>>
>>108200222
>extortion
these guys lawyer rape even if you don't ask for anything in return
>>
>>108200204
Bug bounties solved this years ago at least until everyone and their nan's AI agent started applying for them.
There's no requirement for responsible disclosure. If a company wants to they can have a bug bounty program to pay out to ethical hackers whilst never disclosing the issue to their end-users. Of course that then bites all of them in the arse when they don't update and somebody independently discovers the vulnerability and possibly ends up causing more reputational harm and damage to you than if you just owned up to your mistake in the first place but that's what happens when you choose to role the dice. Sometimes it doesn't work in your favour.
>>
>>108200719
No they didnt
>>
>I found a Millennial. They found a Headline.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.