[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
▼ Settings Mobile Home
/g/ - Technology
Return Catalog Bottom Refresh
Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.
[Advertise on 4chan]
[Return] [Catalog] [Bottom]
Anonymous Archived
02/20/26(Fri)19:01:32 No.108200480
File: 1397830575967.jpg (1.14 MB, 1920x1080)
1.14 MB
1.14 MB JPG
Anonymous 02/20/26(Fri)19:01:32 No.108200480 Archived
I recall GCC having a flag to remove printf's return value (essentially making it void), but can no longer find it. This was probably 10 years ago and distinct from the option to disable unused return value warning with -Wall. Probably the compiler optimizes it either way?

Weird. Feels like some sort of GCC mandela effect.
>>
Anonymous
02/21/26(Sat)03:26:14 No.108202747
Anonymous 02/21/26(Sat)03:26:14 No.108202747
>asking programming related questions and not about AI on /g/
ngmi
>>
Anonymous
02/21/26(Sat)12:06:09 No.108205076
Anonymous 02/21/26(Sat)12:06:09 No.108205076
>>108200480
kino fractal
>>
Anonymous
02/21/26(Sat)14:25:19 No.108205966
Anonymous 02/21/26(Sat)14:25:19 No.108205966
-Wno-unused-result but that's not specific to printf
>>
Anonymous
02/21/26(Sat)15:48:40 No.108206461
Anonymous 02/21/26(Sat)15:48:40 No.108206461
>>108200480
Ask a clanker you lazy nigger
[Return] [Catalog] [Top]
Post a Reply
Return Catalog Top Refresh
[Advertise on 4chan]
Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.