>make edit on Wikipedia with an anonymous account>it gets deleted>do the same edit with my 2 year account with over 1000 edits>it gets acceptedso that thing about wikipedia being a platform everyone can edit was a lie huh?>it getdn
Wikipedia always prioritizes "verified" editors over random one-timers. Even so, I've long since given up on trying to contribute. Even spelling error corrections get auto-reverted, it's no use at all
>>108275420>>108275407why use wiki when ai
>>108275407maybe edit was seen necessary but was challenged as someone preferred old content
>>108275407I remember fixing a spelling mistake few years back and it's still there
>>108275407Is this the original version of this image?
>>108275479yea
>>108275454I would trust an AI based on Wikipedia alone more than AI trained on a bunch of literally who blogs + ai-generated slop
>>108275493arent you trained on 4chan?
>>108275555Human being =/= next word prediction algorithm
>>108275574proof?
>>108275407>make edit on Wikipedia with my John Smith account>it gets deleted>do the same edit with my Noah Goldstein account>it gets accepted
I wish I can draw like that.
>>108275578proof should be that humans invented the language that the ai writes in
>>108275407same for 4chan, all depends on your 4chan_pass cookie nowadays
>>108275848>>108275578
probably because most of the RecentChanges hawks will watch for tags like it being an ip edit, a visual edit, or the "suspicious" flagshaving an extended-autoconfirmed account obviously makes you less likely to be suspiciousthat is not particularly rocket science is it
>>108275493bot
>>108277610this. the guy who reverted me only does reversions. also, less than 2 minutes passed between posting and reverting, he had no time to check the references
>>108277610I want a Lora of Wikipe-tan
>>108280386theres a lot of people who grind recentchanges just to up their edit count and to feel superior by spamming {{uw2}} on peoples talkpages
>>108275600>tries to make joke about jews>uses hebrew originated name as an example of a non-jewish namelol
>>108275407What kind of change did you attempt to make?
Why do people still use wokepedia when all the hard work you're putting in with citations and shit can and will be thrown out the window when some trannies get upset enough and what to be censorious revisionists?
>>108282486I pointed out that George Windsor wasn't on the line of succession until 2013 but was added afterwards, when the article said nobody born before that had their line of succession rights altered.
