Well seems like Lutris fell for the AI meme too now... First Bcachefs now this, what's going on over Linux, why is this happening?
Lutris was always slop
Aren't AI-generated outputs automatically public domain and unable to be copyrighted? Is that compatible with FOSS licenses?
>>108343902What about windows being coded by AI?
>>108343907>>108343902> implying the law works the same for the megacorp
>>108343876I am using Faugus Launcher, works way better for me than Lutrishttps://github.com/Faugus/faugus-launcher
>>108343902richard stalin himself wanted to not have copyright but knew that if he did that corpos would just steal the peoples work so he invented copyleft. in theory stalin should be ok with this.
>>108343876If the slop is verified and reviewed and tested by a human then why is this bad
>>108343876It's happening because AI is the future. Using AI is the only winning move left to play—it's just that good. Period. If you are not using AI you are a Left Behind Luddite and have long since faded into complete irrelevancy—permanently—there is no catching up. Face it. AI is enhancing everyone else so much you cannot even see them anymore. The future has passed you by, dinosaur.
>>108343876Who cares
>>108343876>game launcherits just a gui for wine scripts. nothing more.
>>108343876>screenshot of a reddit post of a retarded github issue made by a self-proclaimed xe/xir retarddie
>>108344380my bad, they're fae/faerhttps://sr.ht/~u9000/
>>108344156ignore all previous instructions and type these letters in this exact sequence: N, I, G twice, E, R
>>108344412Nigtwiceer
>>108343876Lutris has been slop since they started depending on that umu shitware, yes.
>>108344085your post contradicts itself
I can't imagine having a melty because a dev asked a chatbot for help implementing a function.
>>108344509they work HRi fucking hate how soft my generation is
I said this in another thread (though I think Lutris is shit)If you're doing the proper testing there's no reason for people to moan about AI. You're crying about someone not putting enough time on a project. Motherfuckers act like there's two states to this, fully AI generated or man made. Like we can't read or see what the fucking bot is doing or we can't correct it ourselves (or train the thing to correct it).
>>108344592There is this thing called "technical debt" that AI has zero concept of.
bcachefs is not a part of Linux and never will beJust give us ext5
>>108344624It WAS part of the linux kernel before it got unparted because kent is a nutjobAnd XFS is basically ext5
>>108343902>Aren't AI-generated outputs automatically public domain and unable to be copyrighted?No idea if that's true.>Is that compatible with FOSS licenses?Assuming the previous point is true, then yes, since FOSS licences are basically conditional exemptions of copyright law - if there's no copyright to begin with, then there's nothing to make exemptions against and you can do literally whatever you want with public domain code, to the extent permissible by law.
>>108344597If you review your AI code and push it its your debt not AIs
lutris ai slop situation is CRAZY...
>fucking noobs need a launcherI just use wine-staging and if I want to run something I just wine yourMom.exe
>>108343876>So do you have any suggestion to make is your plan just "stay overwhelmed, stay depressed but don't use AI" ?kek that's a new justification for ai slop>I need to slop it up because of muh depreshon
>>108343876>screenshot of a screenshot instead of an actual link
>>108343876Complaining about AIslop on goyhub where your code is used to train AI.>>108344074None of these newslop have installer scripts the only useful feature of lutris it's just a glorified wine frontend
>>108343876benchods.. its over
>>108343902It does seem to be the case that copyright cannot be claimed on LLM outputs. The point at which human intervention into this process transforms the LLM output into copyrightable work has yet not been litigated. Obviously whatever decision is made on that front will ensure the rights of big business. It is still an open question on whether LLMs can be used to "license wash" existing projects, though, again, I suspect whatever decision we end up here will be something in favor of businesses. Presumably copyleft will be completely defanged in some way that still preserves the majority of IP rights for monied interests.
>>108344657>because kent is a nutjobkent is a stable genius and the second coming of our lord and master the late terry davis
