[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/g/ - Technology


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: cortex-a53.png (49 KB, 1058x1134)
49 KB
49 KB PNG
>released 2012
>was used as the sole core design (no big cores) in budget smartphones up until pretty recently, in configurations up to 8 cores at 2.3ghz
>probably used in embedded systems to this very day
>cortex-A55 still hasn't fully replaced it, and the A510 is horribly inefficient
do you like it
>>
Is it the 2500k of ARM CPUs?
>>
>>108346086
Sure, why not.
>>
My brother in christ, a53 was slow 10 years ago, using it nowadays must be self harm.

I have a low-end motorola with 2xA78 + 6xA55 and even that is so-so with Android 15.
>>
>>108347442
Android is slow
>>
Yeah we have some new projects that we plan to use a53 based CPU if the performance test go well.
There's a55 based CPU on the same vendor SoM vendor but changing to a new SoM that you have never used before is always such a hassle.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.