Is there anything we can do to derail or slow down A.I. from taking our jobs?
>>108361207Poison AI training data
>>108361234Is it not too late for that?
>>108361207what trade should I learn? auto mechanic sounds fun and useful, and give you access to plenty of jobs easily.
>>108361299It doesn’t pay shit until you’re a master tech and you need like 20k worth of tools to get started. Not saying this to discourage you, but FYI.
>>108361299Are you fucking stupid? This does not address the topic at all
>>108361337I answered the OP though? By looking for jobs that aren't tech related. You should all start doing the same.
>>108361350That does not answer the question at all.
>>108361357ok ok, I'm sorry. I'll answer the question properly then.>Is there anything we can do to derail or slow down A.I. from taking our jobs?no
name one (1) job that ai replaced
>>108361369I did not ask "will do", I said "can do"
>>108361374Translator
>>108361381ai is worse at everything therefore cannot replace humans
>>108361207sit back, wait and enjoy the collapse of AI.NONE of them are profitable, they are all losing $100 billion a year plus. so either the charge to use AI needs to go up by 100 or it will collapse. its going to be strictly for businesses or gorvernments only.
>>108361444You are fucking stupid mate. Let me tell you why.Money is made up and printed out of thin air. The goal of AI is not to make money but to replace humans labor so that the world population can be right sized to a few thousand people who are worthy.
>>108361522>innit mateAI requires investors to function, they dont magically print money out of thin air. you have the business understanding of a 5 year old.
>>108361444Ask A.I. what is the optimal global population size:The optimal human population size is not a fixed number but depends on lifestyle, consumption, technology, and equity. However, multiple experts and studies suggest a range between 1.5 and 2 billion people as a sustainable and equitable ideal for maintaining a decent standard of living while preserving planetary ecosystems. Paul R. Ehrlich, a renowned population biologist, argues the optimum is 1.5 to 2 billion, noting that current global consumption patterns make this number necessary to avoid starvation, environmental collapse, and resource conflicts. Sir Partha Dasgupta, an economist, estimates an optimal range of 500 million to 5 billion, but with justice toward other species and sustainable resource use, this narrows to 0.25 to 2.5 billion. A 2022 Scientists' Warning states a sustainable population should allow a modest, equitable middle-class lifestyle with minimal climate harm—estimated at 2 to 4 billion. The Global Footprint Network suggests that to live sustainably like the average French citizen, the world population should be around 3 billion, and like the average American, it would need to be 1.9 billion.These estimates reflect that current global population (8 billion) exceeds ecological limits, especially when combined with high per capita consumption in wealthy nations. The focus should therefore be on reducing environmental impact through equitable resource distribution, lower consumption, and sustainable technologies, rather than population reduction alone. AI-generated answer. Please verify critical facts.Connect the dots
>>108361538You are fucking stupid. They will gladly burn through trillions if it allows them to eradicate the useless eaters
>>108361250they always need more data
>>108361207Yeah, don't use it & don't pay for it. The investoids will eventually stop pumping money into it if it becomes clear it's just a money pit with no return.
>>108361303We do have these in central europe as well.>fucking frenchjeets and italojeets
>>108362020Why is everyone so fucking stupid? Billions of dollars losses are a small price to pay to kill off 7 billion useless people
>>108361207Protip: you can't unless you reverse the trend of shareholder primacy at all costs.
>>108362020It is because they desperate at trying to keep the line going up to prevent the great correction at all costs.AI/ML crap is just one massive hail mary to stop the great correction that started back in 2001-2008.
