[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/g/ - Technology


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


What do you think about phones that have those large round cameras?
>>
Makes me want to insert pp
>>
>>108361510
I think phones should go back to using one camera
>>
>>108361520
wpfp
>>
>>108361520
How do you insert thing on a flat surface?that doesn't even make sense
>>
>>108361510
Anything more than an utilitarian 12mp sensor installed flush to the chassis is bloat. Phone cameras are for taking pictures of documents, if you need more than that, get a DSLR or a mirrorless camera
>>
>>108361510
chink-coded
>>
>>108362594
>Utilitarian 12mp sensor
>DSLR
>Mirrorless camera
Am I a midwit for not knowing what any of those words mean?
>>
>>108363899
>Utilitarian
Primarily intended to be useful, in essence, phone cameras should be for practical purposes
>12mp
Sensor resolution, beyond 12MP (12 million pixels) there's not much practical purpose for utilitarian photography, specially if you consider the sensor size is so small
>Sensor
The chip that turns light into values that give you your final image after some processing
>DSLR
>Mirrorless
Types of actual camera, in a DSLR (Digital Single Lens Reflex) there's a little mirror that lets you look directly through the lens, so you're seeing what the sensor would see, and this mirror moves out of the way when taking a pic.
In a mirrorless camera, the sensor sits unobstructed, and you use the screen(s) as your viewfinder. Mirrorless provides marginally better quality, but even a cheap DSLR will outperform any phone for leisure and pro fotography
>>
>>108363946
> even a cheap DSLR will outperform any phone for leisure and pro fotography
Panasonic
Budget DSLRs are literally worse than iPhones
>>
>>108363954
iPhones only produce "good" results due to heavy post-processing, and you don't get to switch lenses
>>
>>108361779
dumb 3 dimensional normie
>>
>>108361576
They shouldn't even have cameras, I don't need one on mine and it's very annoying that there isn't really an option to no have one. I wonder how much money I could've saved if there want a camera built in. I bet at least £150

>>108361779
Imagine a phone you can't even lay down to type, or watch a video. I'd never ever get a phone with this dumb asymmetrical crap. People will settle for anything kek
>>
>>108365582
>Imagine a phone you can't even lay down to type, or watch a video.
What? How does the camera position affect typing?



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.