1. can't write a compiler2. can't write a parser3. can't write drivers4. can't write system/network protocols5. can't write ABI routines 6. can't write embedded programs7. can't write threads managers or schedulers8. can't write hypervisor9. etc etc...this SHIT is for tech illiterate investors and retarded faggots, nothing more.
>>108364710can you?
>>108364729He got you there, OP.
>>108364734i have the potential
>>108364738no, you dont.you've been trying to do these these using AI because you havent got any potential.
>>108364748>you've been trying to do these these using AIno one said that you dumb fucking anus
>>108364710>can't write ABI routinesSo can't compilers.
>>108364729Im not OP and I wrote my own token parser in 2020 in second year of university, before I knew OpenAI even existed. It was very easy to figure out on my own.
>>108364710Honestly you can use AI and feed it information from the any book and let it guide you to whatever you want. Its very easy nowadays and with some knowledge you would be able to tell apart useless AI info.
>>108364710I used it to write a keyboard and mouse emulator over USB on an ancient Android phone from 2012. I even had to patch the kernel through /dev/kmem.
>>108364832>from the any bookFascinating sentence structure.Also you're implying that people know how to open books. No, I'm not talking about reading them, I'm talking about being able to open them in the first place.
ai can't one shot this, but no professional package is a one shot anyway (ie a guy sat down and pounded it out in a day's work).
>>108364833>>108364892>ai can't one shot thisnigger if it shits a few lines of code for you each time you are being very specific, its basically the same as using google and you just wasted your time.i find it hard to believe that someone who actually know what to ask from it will want to use it from the first place.
>>108364946>he's never waited five hours for an utterly subpar result
