As a reminder Pascal to Blackwell was a 10,0000x leap And if you haven't used path tracing because you cannot afford to even though a 5060 can do it for <$300 you're opinion is disregarded. And seriously, 2026 and you've never used path tracing? grim.
>>108365373What the fuck are you rambling about retard? There is no 6090
>>108365373We're never getting the 6090 at this point.Why bother even talking about it?
>>108365373We've entered the phase where (you) post made up shit for attention I see. Too bad there's no 6090 browno fucko.
>>108365373gay tracing is a regressive technology for a solved problem some 20 years ago
>>108365452How was the problem solved?
>>108365373I can't even get 128GB of DDR5 for a reasonable price and you think I'm even considering buying a new GPU lmao
Finally, now i can play 20 year old games with path tracing! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EDFEmw4ab7w&t=386
Nvidia's new consumer lineup:>RTX $60090 ti (32GB)>RTX $6080 ti (12GB on a 64-bit bus)>RTX 6070 and below (single digit production rumored, easier to find unicorns)
>>108365373Well when the 6090 comes out in 5 years after open ai and the entire economy crashes and prices normalize we can talk about it.
>>108365373Aren't nvidia cards just taking open source tech and making it proprietary and selling it as ai improvements? I think I just saw a video on this last week.
>>108365373You're telling me that the new card with RT hardware on board is faster than the old card which isn't RT capable? No way!
>>108366197These arrows are real world objects?
>>108365708He's retarded and is trying to sound smart.
>>108366737Probably just some billboards.
>>108365373If ray tracing is so good why do 10 year old games without ray tracing look better than modern games with ray tracing?
>>108365373nVidia isn't going to make a new consumer GPU.That would be a waste of money and robbing the shareholders of income.
>>108368148art direction > technologybut with the proper people combing both is even better.You're also forgetting how much slop there was 10 years ago, 20 years ago, 30, etc, we only remember the good bits.
>>108365373What about the real performance. Not the upscaled, ray regeneration, denoised slop.
>>108368138I mean, like... does the character that drives the car actually see them? Or are they just a gameplay aid to help the player navigate the race course? If the latter, should they even be reflected in the water puddles on the road? If the former and the character driving the car does in fact see them, I guess it could make sense if he sees them in reflections too.
>>108368151https://nvidianews.nvidia.com/news/nvidia-unveils-rubin-cpx-a-new-class-of-gpu-designed-for-massive-context-inference>It features 128GB of cost-efficient GDDR7 memoryYou are so retarded it's amazing you would even comment about things you don't even know
>>108368219Literally not a consumer GPU, retard.
>>108368219are you fucking retarded?
>>108368225Again, insanely retarded retard commenting about things they don't know abouthttps://www.techpowerup.com/gpu-specs/?q=GB202https://www.techpowerup.com/gpu-specs/?q=GB203https://www.techpowerup.com/gpu-specs/?q=GB205https://www.techpowerup.com/gpu-specs/?q=GB206https://www.techpowerup.com/gpu-specs/?q=GB207GeForce consumer graphics cards, workstation graphics card and server graphics cards all use the same GPU family, if you can't even understand something simple like that just fuck off
>>108368246You're the one that's retarded, Nvidia users the same GPU to sell as consumer, workstation and server graphics cards, do you think they make different GPUs for workstation and servers? No, they don't, fuck off retard
>>108368251>>108368265Wtf do you think "consumer gpu" means?
>>108368273Nvidia is making Rubin consumer GeForce GPUs and Fenyman consumer GeForce GPUs, you too retarded to understand that, that's your problemJen-Hsun himself said "Without GeForce there would be no CUDA. Without CUDA there would be no AI. Without AI there would be no today."https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OQIHpqWRN9s
>>108368289ok i think the issue here is that you don't understand what people mean when certain products are described as for consumers
https://nvidianews.nvidia.com/news/nvidia-announces-financial-results-for-fourth-quarter-and-fiscal-2026Fourth-quarter Gaming revenue was $3.7 billion, up 47% from a year ago, driven by strong Blackwell demandFull-year revenue rose 41% to a record $16.0 billion.Nvidia haters are so mad and retarded they think Nvidia is giving up on 16 billion dollars sales of the consumer GPU market
>>108365373Dont care I still wont be switching from my evga 1070. Ill ride that baby till it dies
>>108368251>>108368265>>108368289Name 1 consumer GPU based on Rubin or fuck off.>b-but they used to use the same architecture Now they don't.>>108368299Nobody cares about gamers, gaming companies driving the demand for high end GPUs are basically dead anyway.
>>108365373fuck off to /v/ faggot.
>>108368297Again people are retarded, Rubin consumer GeForce GPUs and Fenyman consumer GeForce GPUs are certainly coming to the market, do you think Nvidia does different GPU architectures for GeForce? NO, they share the same GPU architecture and driver and CUDA development
>>108368317https://videocardz.com/newz/geforce-rtx-60-reportedly-uses-gr20x-rubin-series-gpusStay mad, clueless faggotRubin GR20x GPUs is coming to consumer GeForce and there's nothing you can do about it
>>108368321ok so when people say "consumer gpu", they're not referring to the architecture. they're talking about the actual product itself.
>>108368328It's called RTX 60 series for Rubin and RTX 70 series for Fenyman, again if retards thinks Nvidia is gonna give up 16-20 billion dollars of gaming consumer GPU sales, think again
>>108368325>Could this be the RTX 6090? (even though Rubin was supposed to be AI only)Another speculation, yawn.
>>108368335Why would they do that when they could sell the same silicon for 10 times the price to datacenters?
>>108365373this is the most gamer brainrot thing ive seen all week>As a reminder Pascal to Blackwell was a 10,0000x leapimagine that, adding hw acceleration for a specific set of operations speeds those operations upgtfo here master baiter
>>108368343Because you're retarded and don't think and use your brainNvidia sells GeForce consumer GPUs that developers can buy and develop CUDA software on to run on server graphics, there's a reason why Nvidia and CUDA dominates
>>108368363This is word salad. You have no idea what you're talking about.
>>108368369You're the one that's writing word salads, you clearly don't understand that GeForce sales feeds developers into the CUDA ecosystem, just fuck off and die
>>108368380Video games are not why people choose nvidia for ai.
>>108368401Too retarded to understand that GeForce cards have full CUDA support and CUDA software developed on GeForce cards will just run on workstation and server graphics card, not wasting my time on retards like you
>>108368436Are you esl? It feels like you can't even understand what my posts are saying.
>>108368443You are the ESL that doesn't understand anything, GeForce cards are used for CUDA development because they are way cheaper than a workstation card that costs over $5000 US dollars, again ESL just stfu and die in a fire
>>108366737>looks completely unrealistic>runs like shitThe worst of all worlds.
That's really cool, I can't wait to not be able to afford it.
>>108368212Nice catch. Good observation.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YwsiMOzB2rcits an quick slide to tell you nvidia tries to get to movie quality rendering, silicon cant get us there so AI is the only viable solution>So if we look back 10 years, Pascal, this was our GTX 10 series of product that was >launched in April of 2016, almost exactly 10 years ago. Uh, if you look at the performance >here with just a software RT core to today, where we have fourth-generation RT cores, >we have third-generation tensor cores, we have DLSS 4.5, which is able to infer 23 out of 24 >pixels rendered. These are multiplicable, uh, multiplicative, that you can multiply them all >together to get a scaling factor that, combined with the algorithm, uh, that is the Rester >algorithm, that essentially gave a two-fold, or sorry, uh, 100-fold improvement in image quality >for the number of rays used. You get a, a total multiplicative product of 10,000 times that we've >mproved the performance over the last 10 years. Now, we're not giving up now. We're still not to >where we want to be. We want that the real-time images look indistinguishable from reality. We >want them to look like a film. But that's going to take, if we were to brute-force things, it would take probably another 100 or a thousand times more computational power. Well, we're not, >we don't have that. Moore's law is dead. We are not going to see 100 improve, 100 times improvement in my lifetime in terms of silicon. So, we're going to be relying upon algorithmic >ingenuity and fully leaning into AI to cross that chasm between what's attainable now with real-time >graphics in games and what's attainable in film rendering.Shame about the state of tech journalism and the state of reddit that spreads those kinda headlines thanks to people who dont read the article or watch the video that are then fed back into 4chan.
>>108368212Dude who cares, it looks cool. This is the kind of thing you'd expect an old game to have and its remake to remove. If anything you should complain that the dim inbetween arrows are gone.
>>108365373realtime full PT with the current pipeline is a memei get that rendering is inherently not a dense problem but at this point it would be just better to make standardized scene encoder and latent neural render the whole scene
>>108365373people caring about muh raytracing or no better than the africans getting excited by marbles and mirrors a few centuries ago.have some selfrespect, stop caring about graphics.care about gameplay mechanisms instead, which have been stagnated for decades.
>>108368742it's a ps2 game
>>108368212The game is abandonware, anyone can download it for free and see for themselves
