If they gave you a better battery you would buy fewer phones.

Portable computing was a mistake. We should have stopped with lead acid.

>>108408991
they want you to be the battery, once they discover how.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Ibz-gPkTMDM

>>108408991
>We keep getting advanced on tech
Not much.
>but not batteries, when will they discover a better way?
There are many, for decades, but our current shitty batteries are cheaper to produce, they also conveniently die after two years which forces you to buy a new device.

>>108408991
Recently those new carbon silicon batteries became a thing you can get in retail. Like 60% increase for same mass/size.

>>108408991
Thunderf00t made a video about this awhile ago. tldr:
>You cannot make batteries more energy dense without turning them into bombs.
>If you really cared about energy density, you would be powering your electronics with gasoline, go to the gas station to fill up your phone.

>>108412739
And he's wrong on both accounts.

>>108408991

https://scitechdaily.com/revolutionizing-large-scale-energy-storage-better-multivalent-metal-batteries/

multivalent aluminum-based batteries are the answer, but they still don't have the same caloric density as gasoline, so have you considered a phone with internal combustion?