>be better than NShitia and AidsMD
no one can figure out Nvidia's drivers or substitute cuda. until this happens, Nvidia will continue to have a stranglehold on the market. imagine if Cuda was public domain and any GPU manufacturer had access to it.
>>108409240I’m actually surprised these cards are not more popular. They’re cheap, and work well in both Windows and Linux.
Are their cards good at path tracing? I'm hoping to build a rendering server for Blender and I've heard Intel's GPU drivers for Linux are really good.
>>108409283Niggas don't know 'bout OneAPI
>>108409298>GPU drivers for Linux are really good.Yes, as long as you’re not on an ancient kernel. They do have PPAs for Ubuntu, but otherwise see this table.https://dgpu-docs.intel.com/devices/hardware-table.html#gpus-with-supported-drivers
>>108409331I don't. so why don't you summarize it for me.
>>108409422Not that anon, but IIRC it's basically an open computing standard that Intel adopted as their answer to CUDA.https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/developer/tools/oneapi/overview.html
>>108409434This right here. It knocks the socked cock right off of ROCm.
>>108409240If there is no driver for Windows 7, it's useless.
>>108409331>C++>GPUMiss me with that shit. I'm tired of these dead boomer langs being forced into everything.
>>108410183Then program in OneAPI level 0. It'll use C, which you'll just have to accept or use some interface from whatever tranny-lang you like these days. For a while there have been Pytorch bindings for Intel GPUs.
>>108409287Massive compatibility problems. Game support has to be added on a game-by-game basis. Old niche games will likely never recieve support. Not surprising since DirectX and Vulkan were developed with direct cooperation from nVidia and AMD, meanwhile Intel has to play catch up. It's also a way more convoluted process designing hardware around a graphics API than designing a graphics API around hardware.
>>108409240What's their market share again?
>>108410657>Game support has to be added on a game-by-game basis.What? No. There's automatic translation layers to fix old DirectX calls.
Arc failed and is losing money. Nvidia just gave a lot of money to Intel to keep using Nvidia gpus. Arc will be shutdown by the investor board before the next five years.
>>1084107445 rupees have been deposited into your account.
>>108409283why, so that someone like AMD or intel could completely fuck up implementation so that there would be three or more competing cuda standards?
>>108410766there needs to be some compromise to Nvidia dominating the market simply because everything is biased towards cuda.
>>108411236We need mathematicians to find ways to use the power of other cards that goes untapped.
>>108410755https://nvidianews.nvidia.com/news/nvidia-and-intel-to-develop-ai-infrastructure-and-personal-computing-products
>>108411249they allready did end of 1990s? was 3com compaq intel cl as a part of nic but they write very little about it
>>108410674RETARD ALERT
>>108412015Doesn't even support your theory. Samsung made screens for Apple Phones and then also competed with them in the phone market.
>>108412149Samsung is earning money with their phones. intel investor board never waited long to liquidate a losing department.
>>108412149I mean, that's a win for Samsung. Your competitor is basically paying you 20% on every phone they sell. Now it's even harder for them to outcompete you.
>>108412166>intel investor board never waited long to liquidate a losing department.This part is a fiction which exists in your mind. You found an article tangentially related to Nvidia and built a retarded theory from it.>>108412138You seem confused. Translation layers is exactly what Intel relies on. Is DirectX 9 old enough for you?https://game.intel.com/co/stories/intel-arc-graphics-directx9-2/
>>108409287They don't work well on Linux. Jank af.
>>108412254What specific problem do you have?
>>108409283>or substitute cudaThey cannot because they will get sued for massive copyrekt and patent infringement, which is really fucking ironic because NVIDIA made a name for themselves by copying patents, cross licensing, and counter suing.They literally have an unfair advantage nobody is allowed to copy.
>>108412254Drive by comment, no answer at all. You wouldn't think Nvidia would care about this dump, but I guess when jeets/AI are cheap you may as well cover all bases.
>>108412207>This part is a fiction which exists in your mind.as an investor, i have been following intel for a long time. The current CEO pledged to the investor board that the company will not pursue any product with a gross margin below 50%. The GPU drought has ended and the retail desktop market is a joke. Arc dgpu will not survive and will join the long list of intel discontinued products (ram, ssd, optane, NUC, compute stick, larrabee, ...), you will see.
>>108412311>The GPU drought has endedMost of what you wrote is retarded, but I think that should remove all doubt.>as an investorI knew a hot take was coming right there.
