STEM fags are roping.
You can't depend on AI for everything.
>>108409441We don't need STEM fags. Learn trades.Finance bros are roping too.
>>108409404>STEMYou mean the T and M fags
>>108409449I don't want to fix someone's toilet after they pooped all over it.
>>108409481Then you will die.
>>108409441Watch me.
>>108409490We should've elected Andrew Yang. he warned everyone of this and proposed NEET BUX for this very reason.
it is time to RETVRN
>>108409441I already do and have been doing for two years.
>>108409441>You can't depend on AI for everything.So? You can't depend on wheat threshers for everything, but they still ended millions of farm jobs.
>>108409441Except you can
>>108409404>Nothing produced with AI can be copyrighted, patented, or trademarked in any way.AI fags are roping.
>>108409404Yeah, all over your chin and fat tits.
>>108409441>You can't depend on AI for everything.You can't, but people will do and because of that everything will become worse.
>you don't understand mom, soon everyone will be unemployed tooget a fucking job
>>108409548Burger would rather suicide than to see their fellow men get an equal chance.
>>108409404Nobody knows what counts as "orginal" in mathematics because there are billions of papers. 1 of which can take years to read and understand if you aren't one of the <5 people working in the subfield and 99.9% of research is thrown away an not taught to anybody.Basically the work of mathematics is going down a really long directory cd codecd coddecd cod e - directorynot foundcd kodefor a million directories, but once you are there you can just type mkdir foo to continue research. The actual hard problems in mathematics are shallow and we have no tools to solve them.
>>108409449trades aren't going to save you bud, we have very nimble robots being trained in every craft and trade.
>>108410598ENTER
>>108409404Even if vibe coding/proving does work as soon as humans lose "the vibe" i.e. try to work on something they have no idea how to do the acceleration stops. >>108410598>>108409449If they can make a robot that can replace all manual labor they can make a toilet that doesn't clog
>>108409723>Nothing drawn with a pencil can be copyrighted, patented, or trademarked in any way.This is what you sound like.
>>108409404>ai is goatedok make it do anythign useful>ai does original maths proofi said useful>......
>>108410671>seething ai fag noisesYour tears are delicious
>>108410684>ok make it do anythign usefulI made $3500 on crypto following AI advice on buying and selling.I lost 40 lbs using a workout plan and diet made by AII created APKs I've always wanted for my galaxy using AII build my first home server using AI instructions and guidance I have big assed Latina porn with AI and fapped till I was dryWhat now, Homosexual?
>>108409490Everyone dies
They can't do very simple algebra or arithmetic but they can do math proofs? LOL no they can't. Someone is lying to you.
>>108409404No, it can't. Next question.
>>108409441its this or nothing, we're in the most unpleasant times right now either we do need AI or we don'tit'll be fun to watch when the AI bubble pops
>>108409404when do you know that the proof is correct? Something that is never really talked about is how many attempts the llm needs and if the layman can judge the outcome as correct or not. I ask it to write down some fem code for a problem can how will I as a dude without a phd know if the outcomes correctly models my problem?
>>108409404STEM fags are the ones who need the mathematical proofsthey're the ones who will even ask for themand then verify themand then use them for anything usefuland they're the ones using AI to find these proofs in the first place
>>108409404>mathematical proofscall me when it does something actually useful
>>108410955all of that seems like something you could've gotten from just knowing how to use google. before the SEO spam killed it, I supposeI wonder if we'll see a similar gimping of AI once the investors start demanding returns and every interaction tries to sell you something
>>108409404Researchers seem to be AI-proof given that data collection is not something that AI can do, and even if it somehow does collect data, there's absolutely zero chance that it will be accepted as we've no way to really prove that it wasn't just collected from other AIs.AI will absolutely speed up things after data collection, so that's quite nice. One thing that is quite interesting to consider is self-reported data; can an AI eventually give answers that simulate real ones? Is there an application for such generated responses? We already know that self-reported data isn't the most reliable and accurate, and you can literally pay companies to survey people so what if the middleman is cut out? I'm not sure what awaits us but perhaps we'll see a greater focus placed on qualitative research?
>>108409723Problem being?
>>108409404and so can wolfram alpha. your point?also, mathematicians, engineers and scientists use math as a inputs to build tools. if you think this is somehow bad for them all... then you are fucking retarded.
>>108409652sexo
>ropingShouldn't they be celebrating? Doesn't this cut down on time to solution dramatically? Surely mathematicians care about the math and not something like job security, right?
>>108413542modern LLMs are way better than wolfram alpha
>>108409404>autocomplete can recite a proofcolor me surprised btw LLMs will NEVER EVER evaluate a proof by the nature of their design
>>108413608>recitetoo obvious
you can tell nvidia is panicking with all these articles coming out at the same timethe PE bubble is popping and you're next lmao, get those golden parachutes ready bros
>>108409404>stem>this one math thingop is just coping about not having a job
>>108410639The problem with uncloggable toilets even if they were possible is that you need people to buy them. For robot unclogger you need just few of them per plumbing company and have people pay you for it’s services.
>>108409652Arts and Humanities bros got the last laugh. It turns out creating beautiful objects and understanding the subtleties of human nature is what people actually value the most.
>>108413294>when do you know that the proof is correct?Proof-checking assistants are a thing. If the conclusion can be backed up by looking at the entire set of premises, then the conclusion must necessarily be true.Otherwise, we could have a few mathematicians getting paid to check AI-written proofs. Then again, they would have to display a high degree of competency in the field they are checking proofs for in order to be picked to judge proofs.
