harry poettering casts a new spell, spawning an artificial bengali to read the code out loud
There is almost no downside in having AI review your code in addition to people.
>>108414466I seriously believe anyone that has worked or is working at Microsoft has brain damage.
>>108414488Worst case it says some stupid shit and you waste 5min reading it. Best case it finds something actually. Just another pair of eyes basically.
>>108414466
>>108414527You overestimate humans, worst case it gaslight a human into "fixing" an issue that wasn't there introducing a bug that wasn't initially present.Or convince a lazy person that bad code is fine.
>>108414551Mate, a dev should be able to read. If you fix a bug that isnt there you are shit and a bad dev.
>>108414488In this case he didn't ask it to review the code I believe. He wrote a comment and he wanted the AI to review what was said in the comment.
>>108414527I agree, but it just looks dumb funny the way he worded it.
>>108414466He's asking a token predictor to predict what a pr code review should sound like given the pr source code tokens as context.
>>108414480kek
>>108414466he's gonna be in trouble, he didn't tell it to make no mistakes
>>108414930no. you summon the bots in the comments to do stuff. it can be merge requests, it can be basically everything. he did what i says. bot shoul review the merge request or wherever he is in.have you ever used dependabot? it's the same with it. you just call the bot and it does its thing.
>>108414930everyone soon enough will be a bad dev since no junior using ai will learn
>>108414480he graduated top of his class at slopwarts
>>108415453oh now I get it
>>108414488>no downside in having AI review your code in addition to peoplecommunism only works if someone else pays for your electricity and tokens
>>108414642I don't disagree, but we were talking about worse case, tons of shit devs unfortunately.
He meant that he has severe permanent brain damage.
