it's 2026, why is my monitor not wireless yet?why do I need 10lbs of cables? we already got wireless keyboards mouse speakersinb4 >muh 0.003ms latencyi dont give a shit about videogames, i'm not a teenager, i just dont want unnecessary extra cable bloat which nobody knows are they even legit, original, scams, or chink clones, are they certified/rated? by whom?
Yes, even more cancerous radiation. Lets hope OP gets what he wants ASAP!
>>108415919You need to be hit in the head with something hefty
>>108415919there you go, wireless screen
>>108415919The image quality would be shit. Wireless does not have the same bandwidth as wired. Also the latency would be significant due to have to having to encode and decade a compressed video stream.
>>108415919https://www.amazon.com/wireless-hdmi/s?k=wireless+hdmi
>>108415919>https://www.amazon.com/EVICIV-Wireless-Portable-Miracast-Computer/dp/B0G1BD4GJYWhats the problem? Are you waiting for your monitor to evolve wireless capabilities? Just buy one you fag
>>108415919>zoomies use wireless everything despite never leaving their desks
>>108415958>The image quality would be shittwitch needs 12mbps for 1080@30fps. do you really need more?
the image quality isn't perfect, but line of sight is important.
>>108415984>1080@30fps. do you really need more?60fps is the minimum to use a mouse comfortably.Watching a video isn't the same as interacting with a graphical interface.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WiDiDead in 2020:https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/support/articles/000021693/emerging-technologies.html
>>108415919>it's 2026, why is my monitor not wireless yet?Huge bandwidth requirement. It's getting to the point that it's difficult to reliably get enough bandwidth even through a cable.>why do I need 10lbs of cables?You don't, this probably has some thing to do with personal stupidity / hoarding behavior.>i just dont want unnecessary extra cable bloatYeah, you want extra wireless transmitter & receiver bloat that's going to be simultaneously more expensive, more unreliable and more prone to failure>i'm not a teenagerCould've fooled me
I use a remote desktop over wifi at work.It's 4K and a bit laggy but still perfectly usable.
>>108415984Twitch looks like shit.You'd need a ~3 Gbps wireless link for 1920x1080 @ 60FPS with 24-bit color1920x1080x60fpsx24bpp=/8/1024/1024= or 355MiB/sNo HDR (but that'd only be an extra 25%), only 1080p, only 60Hz. 3 Gbps.4K, again at only 60 FPS and 8 bits per channel would be 12 Gbps.You can have your 12 Mbps dogshit monitor stream. I'll stick to using DisplayPort.
We tried to solve this problem for VR. The answer is that at high resolutions and refresh rates it's simply a FUCKTON of raw video data that wireless can't handle. VR has some ways to handle it like... not using lossless video so you get compression artifacts, or tracking the eye movements of the user to have higher-quality only where the user is looking.
>>108416023You could greatly diminish the bandwidth requirements (with huge caveats) for desktop use with some kind of clever lossless interframe compression.>Lossless keyframe>Interframes also lossless but only transmit changesBut even that would fall apart pretty quickly.>Web browser UI, task bar, title bar, etc are all static>20-ish% bandwidth saved>Scroll website>Bandwidth usage skyrocketsOr>Drag window>Suddenly hung Windows 95 desktop flashbacks
>>108415994480@24fps is enough for everything.Op is right. we dont need cables anymore
AV1 could make this happen DESU. It supports 444 not just 420 blaze it. Latency would be 100X better than goyforce NOW!
>>108415919Wire"""less""" is a straight up scam and a lie.Not only do you have to deal with the wireless jank, you still have to put down wires anyway.Big (wire)Less Bull Shit.
>>108416812AV1 solves the wireless jank part (mostly) since more bandwidth used = more janky latency. Which is why H264 is straight up ass for streaming.
>>108415919>why do I need 10lbs of cables?An HDMI cable is not even 1lb.
>>108415919The monitor still needs wall power, retard.
>>108415919>just wirelessly stream 50Gbps of data with current technology, why not?
>>108416825You still have to use wires, mate.You still have to use cords, friendo.You still have to use cables, lad.
